Editing Openai/69149e32-ec50-8004-b4d7-3a4d7f8fca9d (section)

===== 1. Use “peer‑reviewed scientific studies” instead of “peer‑reviewed studies” — adds gravitas and precision. > =====
# Avoid saying “hundreds” unless you cite or imply a source. Suggest: >  — “Hundreds” sounds rhetorical; “numerous” is harder to attack.
# Tone-balance “ICNIRP excludes these studies instead of disproving them.” Suggest: >  — Same point, more academic phrasing; keeps it “bulletproof” if quoted.
# “Their silence = your protection” — slightly reframe for precision. Suggest: >  — That’s a stronger legal framing; less open to “pseudolegal” criticism.
# Clarify what “Conditional Acceptance” actually ''is''. Add a single bridging line like: >  — Helps any new reader immediately see it’s procedural, not confrontational.
# Replace “95% back down” — too specific without verifiable stats. Suggest: >
# “Lawful consent — on your terms” → excellent phrasing; keep it bold.
# Final call‑to‑action: Suggest finishing with something like: >  — Strong and resonant ending.