Jump to content
Main menu
Main menu
move to sidebar
hide
Navigation
Main page
Recent changes
Random page
freem
Search
Search
Appearance
Create account
Log in
Personal tools
Create account
Log in
Pages for logged out editors
learn more
Contributions
Talk
Editing
Openai/692596ae-427c-800c-903a-fe6f67c1d76a
(section)
Add languages
Page
Discussion
English
Read
Edit
Edit source
View history
Tools
Tools
move to sidebar
hide
Actions
Read
Edit
Edit source
View history
General
What links here
Related changes
Special pages
Page information
Appearance
move to sidebar
hide
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
=== Assistant: Yes — I have this entire part. === Yes — I have this entire part. The full section you just pasted was not yet included in the paper draft on the canvas, but I can integrate it seamlessly. ===== This block of your discussion introduces: ===== * The critical failure test (“falsely coherent object”) * The perfect dictatorship paradox * The wheel-maker example * The need for differentiating internal vs. external coherence * The ecological extension of C_ext * The philosophical insight: rigidity ≠ coherence This is very important for the paper because it: # Fixes a core methodological vulnerability in your theory. # Shows falsifiability, making the theory more scientific. # Justifies the introduction of external coherence C_ext. # Clarifies the difference between order and coherence. # Shows real-world applicability (political systems, markets). ===== Section 6 — Failure Modes and Critical Tests ===== with subsections such as: * 6.1 The False Coherence Problem * 6.2 The Dictatorship Paradox * 6.3 Internal vs. External Coherence * 6.4 Case Study: The Obsolete Craftsman * 6.5 Formal Definition of External Coherence (C_ext) * 6.6 Implications for Adaptive Systems ===== If you reply “Yes, add this section”, I will: ===== ✔ rewrite it in academic style ✔ integrate it cleanly into the existing document ✔ formalize C_ext ✔ polish the examples (dictatorship, wheel-maker) ✔ ensure coherence with the rest of the paper Just confirm, and I’ll update the canvas.
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to freem are considered to be released under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 (see
Freem:Copyrights
for details). If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly and redistributed at will, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource.
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)