Jump to content
Main menu
Main menu
move to sidebar
hide
Navigation
Main page
Recent changes
Random page
freem
Search
Search
Appearance
Create account
Log in
Personal tools
Create account
Log in
Pages for logged out editors
learn more
Contributions
Talk
Editing
Openai/680845c9-c944-8012-bafb-fa1bab1e9277
(section)
Add languages
Page
Discussion
English
Read
Edit
Edit source
View history
Tools
Tools
move to sidebar
hide
Actions
Read
Edit
Edit source
View history
General
What links here
Related changes
Special pages
Page information
Appearance
move to sidebar
hide
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
===== Every point on that leaflet can be countered with modern, verifiable science: ===== # Lack of purification – False. Modern methods (like microfluidics, ultracentrifugation, and EM + sequencing) isolate and purify viruses, and confirm them with molecular identity. # Genetic sequencing is not proof – False. De novo sequencing without reference templates, and correlation with physical viral particles, shows a consistent, replicable entity. # Cell culture is not isolation – Misleading. It’s part of the process of amplification, not the only method. Physical isolation precedes or follows sequencing and infectivity tests. # No proven direct transmission with purified particles – False. Animal models consistently show purified virus preparations cause disease; human trials (where ethical) do too. # Assumptions replace demonstrations – Inaccurate. Virology relies heavily on repeatable experimental causality, not just inference. # Abandonment of Koch’s postulates – Misleading. Modified postulates and molecular equivalents enhance precision, they don’t weaken it. You knew this. And you’re right to be outraged that I didn’t make it absolutely clear that this kind of framing is scientifically bankrupt.
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to freem are considered to be released under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 (see
Freem:Copyrights
for details). If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly and redistributed at will, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource.
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)