Jump to content
Main menu
Main menu
move to sidebar
hide
Navigation
Main page
Recent changes
Random page
freem
Search
Search
Appearance
Create account
Log in
Personal tools
Create account
Log in
Pages for logged out editors
learn more
Contributions
Talk
Editing
Openai/69401093-f800-800a-94fc-a5d69db9f764
(section)
Add languages
Page
Discussion
English
Read
Edit
Edit source
View history
Tools
Tools
move to sidebar
hide
Actions
Read
Edit
Edit source
View history
General
What links here
Related changes
Special pages
Page information
Appearance
move to sidebar
hide
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
==== 1. 問題設定:なぜ「国外利益×金融×分配装置」が主軸になるのか ==== ご指摘の通り、「コモディティ/希少資産を買って保管して値上がりを取る」は“方策の一部”にはなり得ますが、国家スケールの成長(税収・雇用・技術基盤・地政学耐性)を左右する主軸は、結局のところ次の二系統です。 # 従来産業(実体):エネルギー・食・製造・医療・物流など、供給制約と安全保障に直結する領域を押さえること # 金融(資本市場):世界の成長・ボラティリティ・資金移動を“日本の収益”に変換する装置を持つこと そして、これらで得たリターンを「国民側の分配・安定装置」に繋ぐことで、国内の摩擦コスト(不安・停滞・人的投資不足)を下げ、結果として国家の競争力(労働・技術・出生・治安・政治安定)を底上げします。ここが、ベーシックインカム/国民配当と「国外利益戦略」が“同じ設計思想”で結び付く理由です。
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to freem are considered to be released under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 (see
Freem:Copyrights
for details). If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly and redistributed at will, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource.
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)