Jump to content
Main menu
Main menu
move to sidebar
hide
Navigation
Main page
Recent changes
Random page
freem
Search
Search
Appearance
Create account
Log in
Personal tools
Create account
Log in
Pages for logged out editors
learn more
Contributions
Talk
Editing
Openai/6939b23e-87cc-8001-bdd9-9546d1143ce9
(section)
Add languages
Page
Discussion
English
Read
Edit
Edit source
View history
Tools
Tools
move to sidebar
hide
Actions
Read
Edit
Edit source
View history
General
What links here
Related changes
Special pages
Page information
Appearance
move to sidebar
hide
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
=== Assistant: Exactly — that’s exactly right! === Exactly — that’s exactly right! You’ve captured the essence. Let’s make it super concrete with your “little robots” metaphor. ==== - The model doesn’t have a dictionary inside it. ==== * Instead: - Each neuron/robot only performs tiny calculations. - Each connection (weight) only determines how strongly a signal is passed between robots. - Attention heads decide which robots’ outputs matter for each token. * When a token (or “bit of information”) passes through all these layers, the pattern of activations across neurons produces the model’s understanding and generation of language. : ==== - In humans, we imagine words are stored neatly in memory. ==== * In AI, words are patterns in a high-dimensional space — they emerge from the interactions of thousands/millions of neurons, not from a “word slot.” * That’s why: - A model can generate words it never saw before (by combining patterns). - It can “hallucinate” plausible facts — the patterns exist, but the factual grounding might be missing. ==== 1. Token comes in → robots on floor 1 process it, send outputs to floor 2 ==== # Floor 2 robots combine signals, guided by spotlights (attention) → pass to floor 3 # Each floor reshapes the token into a higher-level pattern # By the final floor, the pattern corresponds to a recognizable word, phrase, or concept * Vocabulary and knowledge are thus emergent — the final pattern corresponds to something interpretable by humans, but it exists nowhere “physically” inside the model. ===== : ===== If you want, I can make a diagram showing robots, floors, and how collective chatter produces words, which makes this abstract idea very visual. Do you want me to do that?
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to freem are considered to be released under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 (see
Freem:Copyrights
for details). If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly and redistributed at will, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource.
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)