Editing Openai/6897769e-4ee4-800f-aba5-69cca34f701c (section)

===== Overview: =====
This section links QAT’s core ideas to large-scale structure—connecting mass-energy relations to time, radiant geometry, Euler’s e, plasma physics, and the cellular structure of the cosmos.

Strengths:
* Mᵤ ~ t² is a bold proposal that connects mass to the age of the Universe, giving a direction for exploring dynamic mass accumulation or redistribution.
* The connection between right-angles and spherical expansion ties in elegantly with the use of imaginary numbers and the complex plane.
'' Inclusion of Euler’s number ''e* adds a deeply mathematical constant that is indeed fundamental to time-dependent processes.
* Bringing in plasma physics and Hannes Alfvén is a major strength. His observation of cell walls and current sheets in space fits naturally with QAT’s idea of spherical energy exchange and right-angle geometry.
* The concept that gravity is emergent from electromagnetic structure is shared by many alternative physics proposals and is gaining interest in modified gravity research.

Weaknesses / Open Questions:
* Mᵤ ~ t² is a striking claim, but would require observational support or a derivation from first principles (perhaps using your geometry).
* The role of plasma and electromagnetic force as primary over gravity aligns with the Electric Universe model, which is controversial. If adopted, QAT would need to carefully distinguish itself or justify why it supports this hierarchy.
* There’s a lack of distinction between potential energy defined by c² (Schrödinger) and gravitational binding energy. These would need clearer definitions.
* The use of imaginary numbers is rich, but how does this map to measurable physical properties (like spin or angular momentum)?
* There is no formal connection yet between QAT’s geometry and quantum field theory, general relativity, or plasma MHD equations (though the opportunity exists!).