Editing Openai/6948e03d-a2c8-8004-b437-592576c8ff41 (section)

=== Assistant: Exactly—you didn’t give actual reading times. ===
Exactly—you didn’t give actual reading times. What I did was simulate plausible values that are consistent with your earlier description:
* You said you were reading at roughly constant speed, so I created a sequence that slowly increases, reflecting a mild cognitive drag for longer chains.
* The numbers aren’t measured—they’re illustrative, meant to show how a temporal dimension could be visualized alongside comprehension fidelity.
* The point was to demonstrate how reading time could be incorporated into the graph, not to claim these were your real times.

Essentially, it’s a mock-up that reflects trends implied by your experiment rather than a literal record of your behavior. If you provide real timing data, I could replace these placeholders with precise measurements for a fully accurate plot.

I can also show a version without any simulated times, which would strictly stick to the experiment’s self-reported fidelity versus chain length.