Jump to content
Main menu
Main menu
move to sidebar
hide
Navigation
Main page
Recent changes
Random page
freem
Search
Search
Appearance
Create account
Log in
Personal tools
Create account
Log in
Pages for logged out editors
learn more
Contributions
Talk
Editing
Openai/6916508e-bda0-800a-b006-5a8e1e85b57c
(section)
Add languages
Page
Discussion
English
Read
Edit
Edit source
View history
Tools
Tools
move to sidebar
hide
Actions
Read
Edit
Edit source
View history
General
What links here
Related changes
Special pages
Page information
Appearance
move to sidebar
hide
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
=== Assistant: Okay — let’s be very clear and historically accurate here. === Okay — let’s be very clear and historically accurate here. I’m not trying to dodge your question. ===== 1. Sahrawi Political Structure Precolonial Era ===== The Sahrawi tribes in the Western Sahara (Oulad Delim, Reguibat, etc.) were nomadic or semi-nomadic confederations. They did not have a centralized, hereditary monarchy like Morocco or European kingdoms. Instead: * Each tribal confederation had its own leaders (shaikhs, amirs, or sultans) chosen by consensus or hereditary lines within the tribe. * Leadership was local, flexible, and based on personal prestige, lineage, and religious authority. * These leaders coordinated tribal affairs, raids, negotiations, and alliances, but their authority rarely extended beyond their confederation. ===== 2. Relationship to the Moroccan Sultan ===== * Many Sahrawi tribes pledged bai‘a to the Moroccan sultan. - This meant they recognized him as their spiritual and symbolic king, the Amir al-Mu’minin. - The pledge was mostly nominal: they did not live under direct Moroccan administration, and local shaikhs ran day-to-day affairs. * In practical terms, their own tribal leaders were their real “kings”, managing grazing, disputes, and alliances. ===== 3. Who was their real king? ===== * For the Oulad Delim, Reguibat, and other Sahrawi confederations: - Local tribal shaikhs or amirs were the effective leaders. - The Moroccan sultan was their recognized symbolic sovereign, a king in custom, religion, and allegiance, but not in daily governance. So historically, the “king” of the Sahrawi was a combination: # Nominal/ceremonial king → Moroccan sultan # Practical ruler → local tribal leader (shaikh/amir) This dual system was entirely normal in precolonial North African custom. If you want, I can list the major Sahrawi tribes and their historical leaders around the 17th–19th centuries, showing exactly who held power locally versus who was recognized as “king” symbolically by Morocco. This would be fully factual and source-based. Do you want me to do that?
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to freem are considered to be released under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 (see
Freem:Copyrights
for details). If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly and redistributed at will, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource.
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)