Editing Openai/690e5821-e2c8-8007-a5a4-e71fe35fb0ce (section)

==== Given your background (software diagnostics, tooling, pattern-oriented frameworks) this alignment is beneficial: ====
* The article provides a validated real-world anchor: the specific categories (CArtefacts, CProblemPatterns, CAnalysisPatterns) are concrete instantiations of the categorical ideas. So your PCT framework can reuse or reference those categories as domain-specific examples.
* PCT can generalise and elevate the earlier article’s work to a broader meta-framework: you can treat the software-diagnostics article as a case study within the PCT universe.
* For publishing purposes, you could cite the article as “Categorical Foundations of Software Diagnostics” (i.e., from dumpanalysis.org) and show how PCT builds on/extends it.
* When designing diagrams and formal definitions in your paper or docx, you can include a section titled something like “Relation to Existing Work”, where you map the article’s three categories to your PCT objects/functors, showing concretely: - Objects in CArtefacts → patterns of artefacts in PCT domain. - Functor FAnalysisPattern → a functor in PCT mapping artefact patterns → problem patterns. - 2-category of generalising arrows → higher-category structure in PCT.