Jump to content
Main menu
Main menu
move to sidebar
hide
Navigation
Main page
Recent changes
Random page
freem
Search
Search
Appearance
Create account
Log in
Personal tools
Create account
Log in
Pages for logged out editors
learn more
Contributions
Talk
Editing
Openai/69624154-2440-8010-8dca-dec4493da06f
(section)
Add languages
Page
Discussion
English
Read
Edit
Edit source
View history
Tools
Tools
move to sidebar
hide
Actions
Read
Edit
Edit source
View history
General
What links here
Related changes
Special pages
Page information
Appearance
move to sidebar
hide
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
=== 一、最核心爭議:這是不是「去商業化的商業代孕」? === 法案宣稱: : 代孕以「互助」為原則,不是商業行為 : (第18條之五) : : LCEWA01_110108_00124 但同一條又寫: : 得在主管機關所定金額或價額內,提供酬金 + 各種費用 👉 這在法律上就是「准許付費代孕」,只是改名叫互助。 ===== 結構性問題 ===== 法案沒有定義: * 「酬金上限多少?」 * 「工時損失怎麼算?」 * 「照護、營養、交通、風險補償怎麼算?」 全部丟給未來行政命令。 這會導致什麼? : 法律寫得很理想,但實務會形成「準市場價格」 在全球代孕實務中: : 只要有錢能換懷孕,就一定會有「貧窮女性承擔生殖風險」 這不是道德判斷,是社會學與國際經驗。
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to freem are considered to be released under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 (see
Freem:Copyrights
for details). If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly and redistributed at will, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource.
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)