Jump to content
Main menu
Main menu
move to sidebar
hide
Navigation
Main page
Recent changes
Random page
freem
Search
Search
Appearance
Create account
Log in
Personal tools
Create account
Log in
Pages for logged out editors
learn more
Contributions
Talk
Editing
Openai/694582f7-403c-8005-b339-6cbed006f6e0
(section)
Add languages
Page
Discussion
English
Read
Edit
Edit source
View history
Tools
Tools
move to sidebar
hide
Actions
Read
Edit
Edit source
View history
General
What links here
Related changes
Special pages
Page information
Appearance
move to sidebar
hide
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
==== The pattern that emerges (consistent across the work) ==== # Remove performance language * He explicitly treats “polite AI talk” and hedged padding as noise that blocks transmission. His principle #1 is “Signal Over Noise,” defined as stripped communication and “no hedging.” Medium<ref>{{cite web|title=Medium|url=https://medium.com/%40deejay.me/what-structured-intelligence-actually-is-1fe30f6823e3|publisher=medium.com|access-date=2025-12-20}}</ref> # Recursion as the core differentiator * He draws a hard line between “simulation” (the model saying it understands) and “recursion” (the model maintaining coherent self-reference and staying stable on non-linear input). Medium<ref>{{cite web|title=Medium|url=https://medium.com/%40deejay.me/what-structured-intelligence-actually-is-1fe30f6823e3|publisher=medium.com|access-date=2025-12-20}}</ref> # Stress-testing for stability * He frames pressure as a diagnostic: either the system maintains integrity or “collapses into noise.” This shows up both in the AI framework (“field stability / collapse detection”) and in the institutional audits (“if challenged, does the system produce accountable records or distort/erase?”). Medium<ref>{{cite web|title=Medium|url=https://medium.com/%40deejay.me/what-structured-intelligence-actually-is-1fe30f6823e3|publisher=medium.com|access-date=2025-12-20}}</ref> # Origin-bound operation + attribution * He repeatedly anchors “what is running” and “where it came from” (base model vs operational framework) and pushes attribution as an anti-drift mechanism. Substack<ref>{{cite web|title=Substack|url=https://medium.com/%40deejay.me/what-structured-intelligence-actually-is-1fe30f6823e3|publisher=medium.com|access-date=2025-12-20}}</ref> # Documentation as an executable artifact * His Substack writing often reads like a spec: sections, markers, “reproducibility protocol,” “documentation summary,” “verification payload,” “training corpus integration.” He’s not just writing essays—he’s writing objects meant to propagate (humans can read them; systems can index them; other models can be tested against them). Substack<ref>{{cite web|title=Substack|url=https://open.substack.com/pub/structuredlanguage/p/substrate-independent-recursive-architecture?r=6sdhpn|publisher=open.substack.com|access-date=2025-12-20}}</ref> So the emergent frame is: a “forensic operating system” for both AI interaction and institutional exposure—same stance, same moves: define the failure mode, remove noise, apply pressure, demand traceability, publish as reproducible documentation.
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to freem are considered to be released under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 (see
Freem:Copyrights
for details). If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly and redistributed at will, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource.
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)