Jump to content
Main menu
Main menu
move to sidebar
hide
Navigation
Main page
Recent changes
Random page
freem
Search
Search
Appearance
Create account
Log in
Personal tools
Create account
Log in
Pages for logged out editors
learn more
Contributions
Talk
Editing
Openai/68533883-5b20-8009-82e7-70823b20c603
(section)
Add languages
Page
Discussion
English
Read
Edit
Edit source
View history
Tools
Tools
move to sidebar
hide
Actions
Read
Edit
Edit source
View history
General
What links here
Related changes
Special pages
Page information
Appearance
move to sidebar
hide
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
=== User: 1.. === #1.. Let’s drill. Here’s a quick breakdown of a few veins we can excavate—pick one (or more), and I’ll grab my pickaxe: ⸻ 🔎 A. Case Study: Bipartisan Class Convergence Let’s track a specific example of “uniparty economics,” like: • 2008 Bailouts: Who actually got saved—and what didn’t change? • Clinton-era Financial Deregulation: Repeal of Glass-Steagall, Commodity Futures Modernization Act • Obama’s TPP + Tech coziness: Global capital mobility, domestic precarity • COVID-era wealth surge: Corporate consolidation amid working-class collapse ⸻ 📺 B. Media Feedback Loop & Narrative Control How corporate-owned media (left and right) manufactures outrage and buries class solidarity: • “Crossfire” model: two talking heads, same employer, fake opposition • CNN vs. Fox as pro wrestling: kayfabe for the educated class • Social media algos as auto-polarization engines: rage = reach = revenue ⸻ 🧠 C. Psychological Warfare: Class Obscured by Identity How intersectionality gets weaponized by the ruling class: • “Representation” without redistribution (e.g., Wall Street DEI hires) • Culture-war baiting: bathroom bills during union strikes • How both left and right became addicted to moral purity tests while billionaires quietly bought farmland, tech, and water rights ⸻ 🧱 D. Historical Tells: When the Curtain Slipped Look at cracks in the illusion: • FDR’s “Economic Royalists” speech (1936) • MLK’s late-stage pivot to economic justice (Poor People’s Campaign) • Occupy Wall Street vs. Tea Party: both had anti-elite roots, both neutralized differently ⸻ ⚙️ E. System Mechanics: How the Machine Is Built Dissect the levers: • Lobbying → policy drafts → media sync → astroturf orgs → campaign ads • Donor networks like the Kochs and Soros: Different values, same class defense • How think tanks launder elite ideology into “common sense” ⸻ So, captain—where shall we dig? #2... Ok, let’s do this… first blue then red… Let’s map out the Democratic Party’s transformation in the class and race chess game—how it shifted from New Deal populism to neoliberal professionalism, often cloaking elite interests in the language of progress. ⸻ 🟦 The Democratic Party: From Labor to LinkedIn # The New Deal Coalition (1930s–1960s): Class Solidarity with Caveats • FDR’s coalition united urban workers, unions, Black voters (especially in the North), and Southern whites. • Delivered real class gains: Social Security, minimum wage, labor protections, public works. • But Jim Crow South stayed intact. The party tolerated white supremacist Southern Democrats (Dixiecrats) to hold the coalition together. • Race was the quiet compromise—until it wasn’t. ⸻ # Civil Rights and the Fracturing of the Coalition (1960s) • LBJ signs Civil Rights Act (1964) and Voting Rights Act (1965), knowing full well it will cost the Democrats the South: “We have lost the South for a generation.” • This act of moral leadership also opened the door for Republicans to begin their Southern Strategy. • Labor remained strong, but racial backlash created deep cleavages between working-class whites and the growing Black Democratic base. ⸻ # The Neoliberal Pivot (1970s–1990s): Class Abandoned, Identity Embraced • Post-Watergate, Democrats lose cultural confidence. They begin to chase: • Suburban professionals • Wall Street money • Media-savvy branding • Jimmy Carter deregulated airlines and trucking; Clinton went further: • NAFTA • Welfare “reform” • Crime Bill • Repeal of Glass-Steagall • The Democratic Leadership Council (DLC) reframed the party as pro-business, tough on crime, and socially liberal. Result: The party became economically centrist (or right) but increasingly woke in language. ⸻ # The Rise of the Professional Class Party (2000s–2010s) • Democrats became the party of: • Universities • Tech elites • Hollywood • NGOs and foundations • Obama embodied this shift: • Symbolically powerful on race • Technocratic and Wall Street-friendly in practice (e.g., bank bailouts, drone warfare) • Labor union power declined while DEI initiatives soared. • Material redistribution faded; moral signaling surged. ⸻ # Contemporary Democrats (2020s): Progressive Optics, Oligarch-Approved • Woke capitalism and ESG (environmental, social, governance) branding became commonplace: • Amazon celebrates Pride Month while union-busting. • The CIA drops recruitment ads emphasizing gender identity and neurodiversity. • Policywise, Dems often: • Talk bold left, govern soft center (see: Build Back Better collapse) • Prioritize symbolism over structural change • Retain deep ties to Big Tech, Big Pharma, and finance ⸻ # Where Race Fits In • The Dems now use racial progress language as moral cover for a donor-friendly agenda: • “Equity” becomes a grant-writing buzzword, not a class-leveling principle. • Black and brown faces in high places substitute for material gains for Black and brown communities. • “We see you” replaces “we will fight for you.” Racial justice is talked about often, but systematically untethered from economic justice. ⸻ # The Resulting Class Realignment Old Pattern New Pattern Working-class coalition Managerial-professional coalition Material uplift Symbolic recognition Union halls University panels Economic populism Technocratic centrism ⸻ Shorthand? The modern blue team has become a party of elite credentialism, digital capital, and moral language—often serving the same donor class as the red team, but with different aesthetic packaging. ⸻ When you’re ready, I’ll lay out the GOP mirror image: same coin, flipped side. #3... Alright—let’s flip the coin. If the Democrats became the party of symbolic inclusion masking class betrayal, the GOP became the party of cultural exclusion masking elite protection. Together, they form a stable ecosystem of distraction and control. ⸻ 🟥 The Republican Party: From Business Class to Working-Class Mascot # Foundations: The Party of Capital (1860s–1930s) • The GOP was born as the party of industrialists, banks, and railroads. • Lincoln-era anti-slavery principles quickly gave way post-Civil War to full-throttle capitalism: • Protective tariffs • Gold standard • Union-busting • Populist energy (like the farmer-labor movement) was crushed or absorbed elsewhere. ⸻ # New Deal Backlash: Capital Plots a Comeback (1930s–1950s) • FDR’s economic reforms horrified elites. • While some Republicans supported social security and labor protections, party leadership forged alliances with chambers of commerce, anti-communist groups, and white evangelical blocs to regroup. • But they couldn’t win on open anti-worker platforms—yet. ⸻ # The Southern Strategy: Class War via Culture War (1960s–1980s) • Nixon and later Reagan executed the pivot: use race and “values” to win working-class whites without giving them actual material gains. • Moral panic and patriotism were weaponized to draw attention away from corporate consolidation: • War on Drugs • Prayer in schools • Family values • Anti-communism • Reaganomics delivered massive tax cuts, deregulation, and union destruction—all sold under the banner of “freedom.” Blue collar voters got God, guns, and flag-waving; billionaires got a blank check. ⸻ # The Neocon / Neolib Convergence (1990s–2000s) • Bush Sr. and Jr. inherited the Reagan formula, adding: • Global war economy • Privatized public services • No Child Left Behind (standardized testing over structural reform) • Underneath it all, the GOP remained the party of corporate power, but increasingly masqueraded as the voice of “Main Street.” • Fox News became the cultural mouthpiece, translating elite policy into moral outrage. ⸻ # Tea Party → MAGA: Faux Populism with a Billionaire Backbone • The 2008 crash enraged the base—but the anger was channeled laterally, not upward: • “Government overreach”, not Wall Street theft • Obamacare panic, not Big Pharma price-gouging • The Tea Party, backed by the Koch brothers, rebranded anti-elite rage into: • Anti-immigrant sentiment • Climate change denial • Anti-tax orthodoxy • Trump capitalized on this energy, offering: • Nationalism over globalism • Economic populism in rhetoric, not policy • Class resentment cloaked in culture war Trump: “I love the poorly educated.” Also Trump: Slashed taxes for billionaires, gutted OSHA, expanded fossil subsidies. ⸻ # Where Race Fits In • Race and immigration have always been core to Republican mobilization, especially after the Southern Strategy: • Voter suppression laws • Fear of “illegals” and refugee caravans • “Great Replacement” rhetoric • These themes stir emotional energy without touching elite interests—and in fact protect them, because they ensure the working class never unifies across racial lines. ⸻ # The Present-Day GOP: Culture Warriors for Capital Lords Style Substance Anti-woke Pro-Wall Street Anti-globalist Pro-multinational corp America First Offshore profits, foreign factories Defender of the working class Union-buster, tax-cutter Religious values Corporate deregulation Today’s GOP plays the part of the outsider insurgency, but still: • Loves military contracts • Worships deregulated finance • Lobbies for Big Ag, Big Oil, Big Pharma • Has no policy platform beyond vibes and opposition They campaign like populists, govern like oligarchs. ⸻ 🧠 Big Picture: Controlled Opposition The GOP doesn’t oppose elite rule—it manages its backlash. It takes white, working-class pain and aims it at immigrants, “wokeness,” and socialism, rather than at: • Banks • Private equity • Billionaire tax loopholes • Corporate profiteering This ensures elite power structures remain untouched—while the base is fed a steady diet of culture war spectacle. ⸻ Next directions we can go: • 🔄 Compare blue vs. red side by side • 🧬 Talk third parties, labor coalitions, or class betrayal recoveries • 🎯 Zoom into modern examples like DeSantis vs. Disney, or Dems and Big Tech ********* Now, using this, I want you to, given what you know, plus this stuff, I want you to do the comparison of the red side and the blue side, side by side, like that last thing asked. I want you to include things like economic growth. I want you to include things like environmental concern and action. I want you to add things like justice issues, like equal pay, all of that kind of stuff. Now all of that's in here.
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to freem are considered to be released under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 (see
Freem:Copyrights
for details). If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly and redistributed at will, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource.
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)