Editing Openai/68743fec-f760-8005-96f0-36db79274265 (section)

=== Assistant: This is a sophisticated and timely question, David — and you're absolutely right to think beyond static infrastructure. ===
This is a sophisticated and timely question, David — and you're absolutely right to think beyond static infrastructure. The idea of a “dispatchable load” is one of the most exciting (and underappreciated) aspects of the next generation of AI data centers — especially in places like Deuel County, where wind is plentiful but variable, and a peaker plant could otherwise fill in constantly.

==== A dispatchable load is a power consumer (like a data center) that can: ====
* Ramp power use up or down in real-time
* Coordinate with the utility or grid operator
* Act as a “shock absorber” for fluctuations in renewable generation

This is the inverse of a dispatchable generator — instead of supplying power on demand, it consumes more or less power based on availability.

==== Yes — especially large-scale AI/HPC (high-performance computing) data centers. They can: ====

===== - Many AI tasks (training models, simulation jobs, rendering) are not time-sensitive =====
* These jobs can be queued or throttled during peak demand or low wind
* During wind surplus, the center can “soak up” cheap energy to do compute-intensive work

===== - Utilities can offer reduced rates if the customer agrees to throttle down during peaks =====
* The data center operator must build this into their systems and scheduling

===== - Modern centers integrate grid APIs, weather forecasting, and load prediction models =====
* Enables real-time load response, aligning with wind forecasts and generation

Microsoft, Google, Meta, and Amazon are already using these techniques to hit carbon reduction goals — especially in northern states with wind and hydro.

==== Yes, if it’s designed and operated that way. ====

A data center that:
* Uses flexible scheduling
* Responds to grid demand
* Ramps up during wind surplus
* Ramps down or offload jobs during shortages

…can dramatically reduce the need to burn natural gas, especially for shortfalls of minutes to hours.

The peaker plant then only runs in prolonged wind lulls, winter cold snaps, or other edge cases — not daily.

==== ### ====

Local governments, utility boards, or economic development authorities can condition approval on:
* Participating in grid load flexibility programs
* Using power only from renewable sources, when available
* Reporting energy usage and carbon intensity
* Installing on-site battery storage or smart control systems
* Demonstrating that operations don’t increase peaker run-time beyond a defined threshold

These types of conditions are already used in parts of California, Oregon, and Washington.

====== : ======

Zoning and conditional use permits can absolutely include sustainability benchmarks. They just need to be:
* Clear
* Enforceable
* Within the scope of local regulatory power

==== If you’re engaging with local boards, planning commissions, or economic development councils: ====

|     |     |
| --- | --- |
|     |     |
|     |     |
|     |     |
|     |     |

==== - Yes, a modern AI data center can be a dispatchable load, and this is increasingly common. ====
* It can match wind output in real-time, reducing the need to run the natural gas peaker.
* Zoning approvals or development agreements can require smart energy use, BESS, or renewable load balancing schemes.

Would you like help drafting a sample zoning condition, or a short policy brief to bring to a local planning board? I can tailor language that balances economic development with grid responsibility.