Editing Openai/69434f20-ed90-800d-ab60-60312c9de3dd (section)

=== User: Loctarjay responded with: ===
Loctarjay responded with:
Originally posted by Captain Blue:
Originally posted by Loctarjay:
You mean the studies they did years ago and have not come forth with anything new regarding the numbers and the same anticheat that is barely being used ?
Sounds like marketing sales strategies 101:
* Highlight how amazing your product is to make it seem important and attractive (Loctarjay quote end)
Anybrain is being used on ARC Raiders. (Captain Blue quote end)
So ?
You didnt answer the question....
Typical Joe behavior, ignoring the topic and saying something irrelevant

Originally posted by Captain Blue:
Originally posted by Loctarjay:
Most people also disagrees with your hackusations and gives legitimate arguments to why you're wrong
Yet in these moments you scream "Appeal to Consensus", which you now prove is a viable thing to be using....
Or is it only viable when you're the one using the Appeal to Consensus🤡 (Loctarjay quote end)
The difference is a consensus can be used as partial evidence in combination with other forms of evidence. it's just that you guys only use consensus between each other and claim it as fact. (Captain Blue quote end)
As expected, you demand it must only be viable when you're using Appeal to Consensus... Which by default makes you wrong, because if the strategy cannot be used by all, then the strategy cannot be used at all
You do know that is part of what Cherry-Picking is, right ?
Selecting when someone is allowed and when the exact same thing is not allowed🤣

Originally posted by Captain Blue:
But again that would require being honest about things which you cannot do. (Captain Blue quote end)
That's actually very funny you should say that, seeing that your response to me literally is dishonest and fallacious😂
Sounds a lot like Projection😂