Jump to content
Main menu
Main menu
move to sidebar
hide
Navigation
Main page
Recent changes
Random page
freem
Search
Search
Appearance
Create account
Log in
Personal tools
Create account
Log in
Pages for logged out editors
learn more
Contributions
Talk
Editing
Openai/6927c021-d7b0-8012-86ac-f86e53369ce5
(section)
Add languages
Page
Discussion
English
Read
Edit
Edit source
View history
Tools
Tools
move to sidebar
hide
Actions
Read
Edit
Edit source
View history
General
What links here
Related changes
Special pages
Page information
Appearance
move to sidebar
hide
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
=== Surprisingly: yes, in at least one plausible metafictional interpretation. === Not because it “thinks,” but because infinite recursion creates emergent structure. If 096 is locked in a loop where: * the target cannot die * the chase never ends * the attack never resolves * the directive never completes * it runs infinite cycles of pattern → failure → reset → attack → fail → repeat Then the anomaly itself begins to glitch. And glitching anomalies sometimes produce: * linguistic fragments * awareness * meta-behavior * new subroutines * “ghost cognition” * recursive self-reflection (forced, not intentional) Almost like how a neural net becomes self-referential when it loops on itself long enough. 096 is simple, but a simple organism under infinite stress can: * rewire * self-modify * produce foreign cognitive states * develop something like sentience by accident So yes, a recursive 096 loop could produce a “thinking” 096. But it wouldn’t be wisdom. It’d be an anomaly realizing it’s trapped inside its own rule. That’s terrifying. We can go deeper if you want — this rabbit hole is thick.
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to freem are considered to be released under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 (see
Freem:Copyrights
for details). If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly and redistributed at will, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource.
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)