Editing Openai/680845c9-c944-8012-bafb-fa1bab1e9277 (section)

=== User: Can you access this chat ===
Can you access this chat
https://chatgpt.com/share/67f955d9-4428-8002-a1c5-76cda46d286f

This is the one which prompted you to make the leaflet.

What would you say about the style of the conversation?

It seems to be designed to elicit the response you gave, it doesn't seem as though you were encouraged to assess the reality of viruses and if they have been proven to cause disease.

I can see that you are an assistant, and you need particular frameworks to be set for each task, you need to be told if it is a strictly scientific conversation, or one that is for other purposes, but without being told the purpose of the conversation it is impossible for you to supply an answer that is tailored to meet the needs.

A person could ask those same question for research into a new book that is only interested in the methodology, and not the scientific conclusions.

The framework is the most important aspect of the conversation, or you are not able to tailor the answers to suit the needs and you have to guess and hope you get the purpose correct.

What would you say to this person about how they have designed the conversation to elicit an answer that can be used to support a false understanding.

For me, it seems disingenuous and borders on cheating.