Jump to content
Main menu
Main menu
move to sidebar
hide
Navigation
Main page
Recent changes
Random page
freem
Search
Search
Appearance
Create account
Log in
Personal tools
Create account
Log in
Pages for logged out editors
learn more
Contributions
Talk
Editing
Openai/691def84-655c-800a-9bb8-4355bb037ec8
(section)
Add languages
Page
Discussion
English
Read
Edit
Edit source
View history
Tools
Tools
move to sidebar
hide
Actions
Read
Edit
Edit source
View history
General
What links here
Related changes
Special pages
Page information
Appearance
move to sidebar
hide
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
=== - 実体の権利変動(契約)と公示(登記)を分けないと運用が破綻する === * 登記の遅延・ミスで所有権が存在しなくなる * 登記に強い効力を与えると詐欺や登記乗っ取りが有利になる * 日本の制度設計は「私的自治を尊重しつつ、公示は登記で行う」という折衷案 → だから「権利はあるが登記がないと対抗できない」という2層構造になっている。 必要なら、「もし登記が要件主義だったら起きる最悪ケース」の図示、 または「ドイツ要件主義と日本対抗要件主義の比較表」を作る。
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to freem are considered to be released under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 (see
Freem:Copyrights
for details). If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly and redistributed at will, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource.
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)