Jump to content
Main menu
Main menu
move to sidebar
hide
Navigation
Main page
Recent changes
Random page
freem
Search
Search
Appearance
Create account
Log in
Personal tools
Create account
Log in
Pages for logged out editors
learn more
Contributions
Talk
Editing
Openai/69737393-5604-8006-a65c-f09cb0d74f29
(section)
Add languages
Page
Discussion
English
Read
Edit
Edit source
View history
Tools
Tools
move to sidebar
hide
Actions
Read
Edit
Edit source
View history
General
What links here
Related changes
Special pages
Page information
Appearance
move to sidebar
hide
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
=== Assistant: Short answer first, then we zoom out. === Short answer first, then we zoom out. ==== Probably ~4 billion years old. ==== Very likely older than DNA, and possibly as old as life itself. More careful version: * Earth forms: ~4.54 billion years ago * Earliest plausible life: ~4.1–3.8 billion years ago * ATP almost certainly predates LUCA (the last universal common ancestor) * LUCA already had: - ATP synthase - chemiosmosis - phosphorylation-based metabolism That tells us ATP wasn’t a late “innovation” — it was foundational. 4 Many origin-of-life researchers think ATP (or a close chemical cousin) emerged in prebiotic chemistry, likely in environments like: * alkaline hydrothermal vents * mineral pores with natural proton gradients So the sequence is probably: : Not genes first. Work first. Then memory. That alone already tells you something deep about how life “thinks”. ==== Once ATP was in place: ==== * every reaction learned to depend on it * every enzyme evolved around it * every innovation had to be compatible with it So ATP became: * invisible * unquestioned * untouchable Exactly like certain things in human systems. And now we pivot. ==== Culture works like ATP because it: ==== * isn’t optimal * isn’t rationally designed * is historically frozen * is insanely hard to replace Languages, rituals, symbols, myths — once standardized — become infrastructure. Nobody sat down and said: : They emerged as local solutions that later became global constraints. Culture doesn’t ask: Is this good? It asks: Is this compatible with what already exists? Same logic. Same trap. ==== Language is almost a perfect analogy to ATP lock-in: ==== * Irregular verbs? Ancient leftovers. * Spelling chaos? Historical fossils. * Gendered nouns? Path dependence. * Ambiguity? Feature, not bug. No one can “upgrade” a language globally. Every attempt fails because: * speakers must remain mutually intelligible * transitions must be gradual * coordination costs are lethal So languages accrete patches forever. Exactly like metabolism. ==== Politics may be the darkest analogy. ==== Political systems often run on: * tribal instincts * dominance hierarchies * in-group/out-group logic * mythic narratives These are Paleolithic modules running inside modern states. We try to layer: * constitutions * human rights * rational discourse …but underneath, the same old chemistry keeps firing. Democracy often fails not because it’s wrong, but because it’s trying to run Enlightenment software on Stone Age hardware. Just like nitrogenase trying to survive in an oxygenated world. ==== Across biology and society: ==== : ATP → metabolism Language → thought Culture → behavior Politics → power None of them are optimal. All of them are ancient. All of them persist because they already exist. Which is why your intuition keeps circling back to this feeling: * admiration * awe * and a quiet, tragic sobriety No miracles. No redesign. Just inherited structures carrying the weight of the future. If you want, next we can ask the really sharp question: are there rare moments when systems ''do'' switch currencies — biologically or culturally — and what makes those moments possible?
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to freem are considered to be released under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 (see
Freem:Copyrights
for details). If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly and redistributed at will, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource.
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)