Jump to content
Main menu
Main menu
move to sidebar
hide
Navigation
Main page
Recent changes
Random page
freem
Search
Search
Appearance
Create account
Log in
Personal tools
Create account
Log in
Pages for logged out editors
learn more
Contributions
Talk
Editing
Openai/6948e03d-a2c8-8004-b437-592576c8ff41
(section)
Add languages
Page
Discussion
English
Read
Edit
Edit source
View history
Tools
Tools
move to sidebar
hide
Actions
Read
Edit
Edit source
View history
General
What links here
Related changes
Special pages
Page information
Appearance
move to sidebar
hide
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
=== Assistant: Given your experiment and the information you provided, a more accurate graph would incorporate several dimensions that… === Given your experiment and the information you provided, a more accurate graph would incorporate several dimensions that the simple 2D curve omitted. Here’s how I would construct it step by step: ===== - Instead of simply numbering chains 1–16, use actual measured length per chain: - Number of clauses per statement - Number of nested dependencies - Word count (optional, for fine-grained analysis) ===== * This ensures the x-axis reflects true cognitive load rather than ordinal position. ===== - Use a continuous scale based on measurable understanding: - Percentage of clauses correctly integrated - Partial understanding (graded scoring per chain) ===== * Could combine with self-reported confidence as a secondary indicator. ===== - Even if reading speed is roughly constant, include actual measured time per chain for completeness: - Could encode as color gradient or as a 3D axis - Captures subtle variations in processing, regressions, or rereading ===== ===== - Include trial-to-trial variability or small-scale dips in comprehension ===== * Captures natural fluctuations and shows how robust the phase transition is ===== - Mark the critical chain size where fidelity begins to drop sharply ===== * Optionally, indicate the tracking vs. reconstructive regimes explicitly ===== - If generalized to multiple readers: - Show multiple curves overlayed to illustrate differences in working memory, processing speed, or reconstruction strategy - Could produce a shaded band representing a “cognitive phase space” ===== ===== - Prefer a smooth curve fitted to data points to highlight the overall trend ===== * Overlay raw points to preserve experimental detail * Use color or shading to indicate rate of change in comprehension (steep drop = phase transition) If you want, I can produce a mockup of this improved graph using your original 16-chain data, augmented with simulated word counts and variability to illustrate a more faithful cognitive phase transition. This would give a clearer, more experimentally grounded view than the first simple 2D curve.
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to freem are considered to be released under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 (see
Freem:Copyrights
for details). If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly and redistributed at will, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource.
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)