Editing Openai/67f9c019-88f0-8007-a867-29e6f1beeb8b (section)

===== • Cross‑Linguistic and Ultra‑Literal Approach: =====
 – Murad’s translation emphasizes tracing Arabic words to their roots in other Semitic languages (like Syriac), an approach that can lead to a rendering which departs from the classical, internal meaning of the text.
 – In doing so, his interpretation may introduce nuances that suggest a human, evolutionary development of language instead of reflecting the Quran’s inherent, divinely bestowed inimitability.

• Implications of This Method:
 – Accepting such a translation as the definitive meaning of the Quran risks undermining the claim that the Quran is divinely “complete” and “fully detailed.”
 – If the translation appears to rely on external, human‑constructed linguistic analyses, then it can be seen as imposing a man‑made framework onto what believers regard as a divinely curated text.
 – This, in turn, challenges the core claim that every aspect of guidance—from legal injunctions to the subtleties of its literary form—is contained within the original Arabic, in a way that requires submission to Allah’s will rather than reinterpretation by human minds.