Jump to content
Main menu
Main menu
move to sidebar
hide
Navigation
Main page
Recent changes
Random page
freem
Search
Search
Appearance
Create account
Log in
Personal tools
Create account
Log in
Pages for logged out editors
learn more
Contributions
Talk
Editing
Openai/69186d20-2d14-8013-b9c6-c09000f173f6
(section)
Add languages
Page
Discussion
English
Read
Edit
Edit source
View history
Tools
Tools
move to sidebar
hide
Actions
Read
Edit
Edit source
View history
General
What links here
Related changes
Special pages
Page information
Appearance
move to sidebar
hide
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
=== Assistant: 2511141758ET === 251114_1758ET short answer: Italic (Latin, etc.) and Germanic are the closest large sisters; Celtic + Italic are usually treated as especially close (“Italo-Celtic”), with Germanic next nearest. Slavic/Baltic and Indo-Iranian are clearly further out. More precise: # Macro-family: - Celtic is one branch of Indo-European (IE). - All IE branches share a huge inherited core; “closest” means who shares the most ''secondary'' innovations beyond basic IE stuff. # Italo-Celtic hypothesis (closest sister) - There is a long-running, still quite plausible view that Celtic and Italic (Latin, Oscan, Umbrian, etc.) form a higher-order subgroup Italo-Celtic. - Shared non-trivial innovations (not just “everyone has cases and gender”) include things like: - Similar superlative formation (-amo- / -isamo- types). - Parallel developments in verb morphology, especially future/ subjunctive formations. - Some shared sound changes and lexical items that look too specific to be coincidence or pure areal contact. - Debate is about whether these come from a true common intermediate proto-language (Proto-Italo-Celtic) or from very intense early contact between already distinct Italic and Celtic; but one way or the other, Italic is clearly the closest big neighbour. # Germanic as next-nearest neighbour - After Italic, Germanic shows a fair number of shared innovations with Celtic that other branches lack (details get technical: specific sound changes, lexical isoglosses, some syntax). - Many historical linguists are comfortable saying something like: > - Again, it’s partly contact, partly genuinely shared developments. # What you should remember If you want a 3-step mental map: - Celtic is Indo-European. - Within IE, its closest substantial sister cluster is Italic (Latin & friends), often grouped as Italo-Celtic, whether by descent or by intense early convergence. - Just outside that, Germanic is the next strongest associate; Slavic/Baltic/Indo-Iranian sit further away in terms of distinctive shared innovations. So “closest family” in the sense you care about = Italic, with Germanic as the next-closest big branch.
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to freem are considered to be released under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 (see
Freem:Copyrights
for details). If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly and redistributed at will, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource.
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)