Jump to content
Main menu
Main menu
move to sidebar
hide
Navigation
Main page
Recent changes
Random page
freem
Search
Search
Appearance
Create account
Log in
Personal tools
Create account
Log in
Pages for logged out editors
learn more
Contributions
Talk
Editing
Openai/691c581b-5cd8-800a-8ebe-218c28225383
(section)
Add languages
Page
Discussion
English
Read
Edit
Edit source
View history
Tools
Tools
move to sidebar
hide
Actions
Read
Edit
Edit source
View history
General
What links here
Related changes
Special pages
Page information
Appearance
move to sidebar
hide
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
==== 📌 法沒有改,為什麼保障還是會「一定」受到衝擊? ==== 原因很簡單: 稅收的流向變了,但保障公式沒跟著調整。 就像你月薪少了 20%,但房貸還是同一筆, 即使「法律上你仍負擔有餘」, 實際上你會感到吃緊,其他項目勢必被壓縮。 教育預算也一樣。 中央雖然仍有義務保障教育經費,但資源基礎減少後, 最終反映在: * 編列時的總額猶豫 * 分配時的彈性下降 * 地方配合款增加困難 * 學校端長期面臨資源緊縮 這不是「可能」發生,而是「一定會發生」的結果。
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to freem are considered to be released under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 (see
Freem:Copyrights
for details). If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly and redistributed at will, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource.
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)