Jump to content
Main menu
Main menu
move to sidebar
hide
Navigation
Main page
Recent changes
Random page
freem
Search
Search
Appearance
Create account
Log in
Personal tools
Create account
Log in
Pages for logged out editors
learn more
Contributions
Talk
Editing
Openai/68c0109a-3744-8002-80a6-138182f7ddda
(section)
Add languages
Page
Discussion
English
Read
Edit
Edit source
View history
Tools
Tools
move to sidebar
hide
Actions
Read
Edit
Edit source
View history
General
What links here
Related changes
Special pages
Page information
Appearance
move to sidebar
hide
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
==== ### ==== If the AGM didnβt occur lawfully in May 2024: * Decisions made at the April meeting are invalid, including: - Election of the Chair - Approval of financial documents like the AGAR for 2023β24 - Committee decisions or delegations This means the AGAR for 2023β24 might not have been lawfully approved before submission (if it was submitted at all). ===== The failure to properly hold and minute an AGM in May raises serious red flags, especially when: ===== ====== Youβve seen no evidence it: ====== * Was approved by full council * Was submitted to auditors * Had a published public rights notice in Summer 2024 ====== The change of RFO in Autumn 2024: ====== * May have left records incomplete or not transferred properly * Could lead to lost accountability * Prevents the current RFO from verifying 2023β24 finances with full confidence ====== Jane Timbrell signed the 2025 notice β but if she was not validly elected Chair in May 2024 (due to no AGM), then: ====== * Her authority to sign official documents may be in doubt * This could be challenged as procedural illegality ===== A deliberate or careless attempt to disguise the April meeting as an AGM could signal: ===== * Attempts to avoid scrutiny * A cover for missing or irregular spending * An attempt to "backdate" legitimacy of decisions like financial approvals
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to freem are considered to be released under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 (see
Freem:Copyrights
for details). If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly and redistributed at will, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource.
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)