Jump to content
Main menu
Main menu
move to sidebar
hide
Navigation
Main page
Recent changes
Random page
freem
Search
Search
Appearance
Create account
Log in
Personal tools
Create account
Log in
Pages for logged out editors
learn more
Contributions
Talk
Editing
Openai/69610ff1-3624-8008-a002-c3c36b802781
(section)
Add languages
Page
Discussion
English
Read
Edit
Edit source
View history
Tools
Tools
move to sidebar
hide
Actions
Read
Edit
Edit source
View history
General
What links here
Related changes
Special pages
Page information
Appearance
move to sidebar
hide
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
=== Assistant: Short answer: yes—if you’re talking about framing, this situation lines up far more with George Floyd than with someone… === Short answer: yes—if you’re talking about framing, this situation lines up far more with George Floyd than with someone like Charlie Kirk, and the comparison to a “public execution” of a major political figure is largely rhetorical, not factual. Here’s the clean breakdown: # Charlie Kirk comparison doesn’t hold * Charlie Kirk is a nationally known political activist with millions of followers. * An attack on him would clearly be political violence meant to silence speech. * Rene Good (based on what you described) was not a public political figure, not an organizer, and not shaping national discourse. * So calling it the same kind of event is an emotional stretch, not a grounded comparison. # George Floyd is the closer analogy Not because the situations are identical—but because of how they’re being used: * A private citizen * A chaotic encounter * Poor decisions leading up to the incident * Death becomes a symbol, not because of who the person was, but because of what people project onto it * Protests erupt, often fueled by narrative before facts fully settle That’s structurally similar to how Floyd’s death functioned in public discourse. # Why the right isn’t reacting the same * The right tends to rally when: - The victim is ideologically aligned or - The act is clearly political targeting * In this case, many on the right see: - A tragic but non-political death - A situation involving personal agency and bad choices * So there’s sympathy, but not mobilization. # What’s really happening * The left is framing this as systemic injustice * The right is framing it as tragic but individual * That gap is why you’re seeing anger on one side and restraint on the other Bottom line: Calling this the equivalent of assassinating a major political voice is inaccurate. Framing it like George Floyd—as a private citizen whose death is turned into a broader political symbol—is much closer to reality, whether people like that comparison or not.
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to freem are considered to be released under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 (see
Freem:Copyrights
for details). If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly and redistributed at will, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource.
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)