Jump to content
Main menu
Main menu
move to sidebar
hide
Navigation
Main page
Recent changes
Random page
freem
Search
Search
Appearance
Create account
Log in
Personal tools
Create account
Log in
Pages for logged out editors
learn more
Contributions
Talk
Editing
Openai/6933ffb6-9ed8-8010-99bb-a5bc968f2d9b
(section)
Add languages
Page
Discussion
English
Read
Edit
Edit source
View history
Tools
Tools
move to sidebar
hide
Actions
Read
Edit
Edit source
View history
General
What links here
Related changes
Special pages
Page information
Appearance
move to sidebar
hide
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
=== Assistant: Short answer: It isn’t “far superior.” === Short answer: It isn’t “far superior.” Long answer: Gemini 3 and ChatGPT excel in different areas, depending on the model version, your task, and the evaluation metrics you care about. Here’s a clear, balanced breakdown: ==== These points apply to some Gemini 1.5 / 2 / 3 early benchmarks and user impressions: ==== ===== Some users report that Gemini models feel snappier at: ===== * Completing large code blocks * Keeping consistent variable names * Following long files with many dependencies ===== Google often pushes larger context windows (e.g., millions of tokens). ===== This is useful for: * Processing entire repositories * Reading long PDFs in one go ===== Google has strong native video-understanding pipelines. ===== If someone is using Google’s ecosystem, Gemini might interpret video frames more seamlessly. ==== ### ==== ChatGPT tends to outperform in: * Step-by-step reasoning * Consistent rule-following * Complex instructions with multiple constraints ===== ChatGPT is generally stronger in: ===== * Creative writing * Formal writing * Explanations and educational content ===== ChatGPT is usually ahead in: ===== * Code execution * File tools (PDF, DOCX, etc.) * Advanced reasoning modes * Developer ecosystem (Assistants API, ReAct, etc.) ===== Most independent evaluations show: ===== * GPT models hallucinate less * Provide more grounded references * Show more stable reasoning under stress tests ==== No model is “superior overall.” Instead, rankings vary: ==== | | | | | --- | --- | --- | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | So the idea that Gemini 3 is “far superior” is mostly marketing + selective demos + specific niche tasks. ==== It’s not that one model is universally better—each has strengths. ==== People often think a competitor model is “far superior” because it shines in the one task they tested. If you tell me which tasks you care about, I can compare them directly and give a real answer.
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to freem are considered to be released under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 (see
Freem:Copyrights
for details). If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly and redistributed at will, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource.
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)