Editing Openai/68bb7e7b-d9f4-8009-88a2-53802e696f6e (section)

=== Assistant: Here’s your transcript with punctuation, capitalization, and readability improved. ===
Here’s your transcript with punctuation, capitalization, and readability improved. I kept the spoken rhythm intact but made it clear enough for reading:

Transcript (Edited)

All right, ladies and gentlemen, thank you so much for coming.

I think it is a very important evening tonight, because here it is—this is what I call the smoking gun.

In this documentation, it becomes quite clear, and Naomi will then, of course, elaborate on that: Pfizer lied, and so did our governments.

And how did it all start? It started pretty much out of something called the Freedom of Information Act, requiring Pfizer—respectively the FDA, the Food and Drug Administration of the United States—to release these Pfizer papers.

Pfizer, respectively the FDA, not wanting to do that, petitioned a court, asking the judge to allow the FDA to keep the papers under wraps for 75 years.

Interestingly enough, in Germany this April, there was a discussion about abolishing the so-called Freedom of Information Act—which allows any citizen to ask the government for information. They were debating abolishing that right for citizens altogether. That’s a big tell: they no longer want citizens to even know what the government should be publishing. But that is just a side note.

So anyhow, the FDA wanted the Pfizer papers locked up for 75 years, which the judge did not go with. Then the FDA offered, “Well then, we would be prepared to publish 500 pages per month.” Which in essence would have taken 75 years to get all of the papers out, because in total it was roughly 450,000 pages.

The judge didn’t want any of that, and he ordered the FDA to release 55,000 pages per month over a period of about one year, or one and a half years. And then it was all there.

Our very honorable guest tonight, Dr. Naomi Wolf, was concerned that it would just be lost in history—as you said earlier—because there is no way a layman can sift through 450,000 pages of highly technical information.

So what Naomi managed to do was to gather 3,500 volunteers globally, sifting through that information and putting it all together for everyone to see and read.

Like I said, it is the smoking gun. We have the information.

I remember today—I actually looked it up—it was on July 25, 2022, I made a public comment at an event like this, and I will read to you what I said three years ago:

: 

Back then, anyone could have known, if they wanted to know. All you had to do was go through the adverse event reports in the United States, and you would have found that within the first seven months of the rollout of the mRNA injection, there were 20 times more serious adverse effects and 23 times more deaths reported than from all other vaccines combined since the 1970s.

I repeat: seven months of mRNA injections, 20 times more serious side effects, and 23 times more deaths reported than all other vaccines combined in a period of 30 years.

This is the lie that people had pushed down their throats. They were threatened. They were ostracized. They were criminalized. You name it—it happened.

So it was particularly interesting that I made this comment three years ago, and then I read it in your book, Naomi, where in the very first pages you said the very same thing.

Yes, I stand by that comment, and I will be repeating it for times to come.

But you didn’t come here to listen to my boring remarks. I am pretty sure you all came to see and hear Dr. Naomi—Campbell? Can you imagine? Great, isn’t it?

Of course, Dr. Naomi Wolf. And I really have to thank you. You put in a lot of work. Just flipping through the pages, it is so much information. But to compile it and put it together for laymen to understand and read, to really understand the massive lie we have been subjected to—that is extraordinary.

So, I would very much like you to join me in welcoming the great Naomi Wolf.

Do you want me to continue and clean up Naomi Wolf’s full speech as well, or just leave it at the opening remarks and introduction?