Jump to content
Main menu
Main menu
move to sidebar
hide
Navigation
Main page
Recent changes
Random page
freem
Search
Search
Appearance
Create account
Log in
Personal tools
Create account
Log in
Pages for logged out editors
learn more
Contributions
Talk
Editing
Openai/672190ec-af50-800e-b8b7-2633d2f79997
(section)
Add languages
Page
Discussion
English
Read
Edit
Edit source
View history
Tools
Tools
move to sidebar
hide
Actions
Read
Edit
Edit source
View history
General
What links here
Related changes
Special pages
Page information
Appearance
move to sidebar
hide
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
=== Assistant: In theory, humans would have faced extreme difficulty winning a conventional ground war against Covenant infantry witho… === In theory, humans would have faced extreme difficulty winning a conventional ground war against Covenant infantry without the Covenant glassing the planet, but a decisive human victory wasn't entirely out of reach. A closer look at the Covenant’s strengths, human advantages, and the logistics involved paints an intriguing picture. ===== 1. Superior Technology: Covenant infantry weapons were more powerful, with plasma weapons capable of causing severe damage to human armor and infrastructure. Elites wore energy shields, which outclassed standard UNSC body armor, making them difficult for even well-trained Marines to kill without high-powered weaponry. ===== # Variety in Infantry: Covenant infantry included not only Elites and Grunts but also Hunters, Jackals, and Brutes, each with specific battlefield roles. This gave the Covenant a flexible and formidable ground presence that could adapt to a variety of combat situations. # Support from Advanced Vehicles: The Covenant could deploy formidable armored vehicles like Wraiths and Ghosts. Human forces would struggle to counter these vehicles without heavy losses, especially given Covenant’s air support with Banshees and Spirits for rapid redeployment. # Size and Numbers: The Covenant empire had immense numbers at its disposal, with entire species contributing to its ranks. In prolonged ground engagements, Covenant forces could afford attrition that humans couldn’t. ===== 1. Superior Tactics and Guerilla Warfare: Humans had a historical advantage in using asymmetric warfare. The UNSC forces could exploit terrain, set ambushes, and use guerilla tactics effectively, something the Covenant didn’t always excel at. Human commandos, such as ODSTs and Spartans, also provided a psychological edge and a highly effective strike force. ===== # Familiarity with Terrain: Fighting on Earth, human forces would know the geography intimately and could use this to their advantage in setting traps, establishing choke points, and fortifying defensive positions. # Resilience and Morale: Human soldiers were fighting for their homes and the survival of their species. Historically, this kind of motivation can have a profound effect on morale and the tenacity of ground troops, making them willing to resist even against overwhelming odds. # Localized Air Support and Heavy Artillery: The UNSC had a capable (though technologically inferior) array of aircraft and artillery. On Earth, logistical advantages and pre-existing infrastructure might allow humans to sustain this firepower longer than on other worlds. ===== Without glassing, a Covenant victory in a prolonged ground war on Earth would be uncertain. While the Covenant's superior technology would give them an initial advantage, humans' tactical ingenuity, guerilla warfare, and tenacious defense would complicate Covenant plans. In a protracted engagement, the Covenant could risk heavy casualties, which might make them reconsider a direct confrontation. ===== ===== The Covenant could establish dominance initially but might struggle to maintain control without resorting to glassing or resorting to total war tactics that risked significant Covenant losses. In this scenario, humans might not "win" in the traditional sense but could potentially force a costly stalemate, slowing the Covenant enough to make full occupation undesirable. =====
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to freem are considered to be released under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 (see
Freem:Copyrights
for details). If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly and redistributed at will, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource.
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)