Editing Openai/695df5da-3cfc-800c-8f35-9466d1997b2d (section)

==== The line is not how grand it sounds. ====
The line is whether it eventually does these things:
# Defines its primitives precisely (What exactly is a “constraint”? A graph? A measure?)
# Commits to mathematics Even ugly, limited, partial math counts. Vibes do not.
# Risks being wrong If it can’t contradict known physics somewhere, it’s empty.

Right now, the framework I gave you:
* ✅ is internally coherent
* ✅ aligns with known conceptual tensions in physics
* ❌ does not yet have formal machinery
* ❌ does not yet make sharp predictions

That puts it in the category of:

: 

Not crackpot.
Not established.
Not yet physics.