Editing Openai/6889f15f-fcb0-8003-87d9-1571c30a74bb (section)

===== #### =====
* Address Lingering Domestic Issue (Campaign promise): Likely AP cost: 1–2, depending on approach.
* Legislative Session Prep: Should we allocate 2–4 AP to move our top two legislative priorities forward?
* Homeland Security is stable for now (6), and our Outstanding Homeland Security Chief is helping. Any pressing domestic threats?

====== - We’re facing four potential auto-loss war zones. I’d like a quick ranking of which one is most likely to escalate in Turn 1. ======
* I want to gather intel, position forces, or open backchannels in the most unstable region. Likely cost: 1–3 AP.
* Our Intel Advisors are deployed in high-risk zones. Is there value in using AP for Covert Actions or Support Operations this turn?

====== - China: 4 Influence — pacing ahead. ======
* Russia: 3 Influence and gunning for a win condition involving Eastern Europe and Eurozone destabilization.

We may need to use 2–3 AP to reduce influence, aid allies, or shore up NATO relations.

====== - We are currently at Effectiveness 4. Should we spend 1 AP to call a Cabinet Meeting to boost key functions? ======

====== - SOE is 6 but worsening. ======
* China’s banking crisis is already dragging global markets, and it might hit us again if they don’t recover.

Do we allocate AP now to stimulate the economy or wait to see where the crisis trends?