Editing Openai/6973e373-2b8c-800d-84b7-d7001cfc6bac (section)

==== ### ====

Jordan is a high-performing professional writer/editor (makes good money writing), and has spent the last 2 years doing editorial cleanups of AI-assisted drafts for clients. They have strong heuristics for “AI-ish” writing (often right, sometimes wrong), and a strong value bias toward brevity and structure.

Jordan isn’t especially emotional here. They’re not seeking status in the sub. They’re not trying to dominate. They’re doing something they’ve done 1,000 times: “reduce cognitive load so more people read the thing.”

===== Jordan posts: =====
* “The pinned post is too long; valid criticism.”
* “It feels AI-generated and unpruned; obvious to anyone who’s used AI.”
* “If you didn’t put time into editing, people won’t feel it’s worth their time.”
* “I read the whole thing; prose is longer than needed.”
* “Better structure is separate linked threads, not one omnibus.”
* “Flow chart should be a graphic; list spam should be organized.”
* “You (OP) seem to take criticism poorly; your replies are meandering; this is gish gallop.”
* “Just accept critique; thank people; drop personal attacks.”
* Adds the word-count comparison and mentor anecdote about overwriting defensively.
* Ends with drafting advice and a credential line (“I make a lot of money writing”).

That is basically SReflection.

===== OP responds (as you did) with: “I wrote and edited for hours; you’re overgeneralizing; quote what’s false; show your work.” =====

Jordan would have updated, but doesn’t get the chance because:
* They posted the addendum and then got banned quickly for the “gish gallop / mod censure” framing before they could reply again, OR
* They go offline for 10 hours, return, and see they’re banned / thread locked.

So we never see whether they’ll repair.