Jump to content
Main menu
Main menu
move to sidebar
hide
Navigation
Main page
Recent changes
Random page
freem
Search
Search
Appearance
Create account
Log in
Personal tools
Create account
Log in
Pages for logged out editors
learn more
Contributions
Talk
Editing
Openai/693444d9-c740-800a-86c3-4f51b26be63e
(section)
Add languages
Page
Discussion
English
Read
Edit
Edit source
View history
Tools
Tools
move to sidebar
hide
Actions
Read
Edit
Edit source
View history
General
What links here
Related changes
Special pages
Page information
Appearance
move to sidebar
hide
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
=== 六、整體評估(以「人口」為核心的結語) === * 人口趨勢會改變動機、資源與時機:中國與日本、台灣的人口問題會影響它們的國內穩定與軍事人力,進而改變策略(更偏向高技術化、灰區行為或聯盟化)。 * 但戰爭不是人口孤立造成的必然結果:政治、經濟、核威懾、國際反應與成本估算同樣關鍵。現階段最可能看到的是更頻繁的低強度摩擦與灰色戰爭,以及在特定情勢下(誤判或重大事件)出現升級風險。Stimson Center<ref>{{cite web|title=Stimson Center|url=https://www.stimson.org/2025/rethinking-the-threat-why-china-is-unlikely-to-invade-taiwan/|publisher=Stimson Center|access-date=2025-12-06}}</ref> 如果你想,我可以接著做: # 把上面情境量化成「短期(1–3 年)、中期(3–10 年)、長期(10–30 年)」的風險矩陣(包含可能的觸發事件與對應機率範圍與參考來源)。 # 或把焦點放到台灣應如何用人口脆弱性轉化為戰略優勢(例如全民防衛、科技韌性、外交多角化)並列出具體政策建議與可衡量指標。 你要我做哪一個延伸分析?
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to freem are considered to be released under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 (see
Freem:Copyrights
for details). If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly and redistributed at will, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource.
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)