Editing Openai/691e6bfc-7024-8011-90e5-bfcc91b3ee0a (section)

===== If WSI wants to learn from KI without being captured by it, I would recommend: =====
# Demand a clear statement of faith and theological boundaries - Confirm that KI affirms classic Christian orthodoxy (Trinity, incarnation, atonement, resurrection, salvation by grace through faith). - Ask explicitly how they understand salvation vs. works vs. wealth (Matthew 25 + 1 Tim 6 + James 5).
# Separate “tools” from “theology brand” - You may adopt or adapt useful practical tools (business-ethics frameworks, testimonies, case studies) without adopting “Sheep Nation” branding. - You can frame WSI’s narrative in more grounded biblical categories: stewardship, justice, generosity, care of the poor, Great Commission, and neighbour-love.
# Contextualise for WSI’s justice & SDG orientation - Any KI materials integrated into WSI should be reinterpreted through your existing lenses: - SDG 1–3 (poverty, hunger, health). - SDG 11 (sustainable cities & communities). - Timebank / CES modes (time-only, gift, swap, mixed, etc.). - Make it explicit that small enterprises, co-ops, and low-income participants are equally central to WSI’s Kingdom vision as high-net-worth entrepreneurs.
# Governance & accountability - If you partner at any level, clarify in writing: - What can and cannot be said using WSI’s name and domains. - That WSI does not guarantee financial outcomes or imply that business success equals God’s favour. - Consider a theological advisory circle (local pastors / elders from trusted churches) to review any imported material.
# Pilot, don’t roll out globally - Test a small “Marketplace & Justice” module inside one WSI Community Cloud node: - Combine KI-style stewardship teaching with strong biblical warnings on wealth (1 Tim 6, James 5) and the Matthew 25 focus on the poor.Bible Gateway<ref>{{cite web|title=Bible Gateway|url=https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=1+Timothy+6%3A17-19&version=NIV|publisher=Bible Gateway|access-date=2025-11-22}}</ref> - Evaluate: Does it actually produce more generosity, fairer practices, and service to “the least of these”? Or mostly aspirational business talk?