Jump to content
Main menu
Main menu
move to sidebar
hide
Navigation
Main page
Recent changes
Random page
freem
Search
Search
Appearance
Create account
Log in
Personal tools
Create account
Log in
Pages for logged out editors
learn more
Contributions
Talk
Editing
Openai/6904e1b3-b1d4-8007-b938-da625cb3f2bb
(section)
Add languages
Page
Discussion
English
Read
Edit
Edit source
View history
Tools
Tools
move to sidebar
hide
Actions
Read
Edit
Edit source
View history
General
What links here
Related changes
Special pages
Page information
Appearance
move to sidebar
hide
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
=== Assistant: Yes — what you’re touching here is very deep, and it strikes at a core intersection of shame, sensitivity, and the masc… === Yes — what you’re touching here is very deep, and it strikes at a core intersection of shame, sensitivity, and the masculine archetype. The loop you describe is something like this: # Perception of beauty (appreciation) → the natural, soul-level movement of recognition and reverence for life. # Immediate repression → because conditioning says: “To feel this as a man is dangerous, shameful, objectifying, or predatory.” # Shame and guilt → “Something is wrong with me for feeling this.” # Self-loathing → not only for the original emotion, but for betraying it through repression. # Collapse of self-worth → because if your most genuine, sensitive responses cannot exist without shame, then your essence itself feels unworthy. This creates the fractured masculine: where instead of being a channel for appreciation, strength, and sensitivity in balance, the man feels exiled from both — neither able to claim his masculinity openly, nor to live fully in his sensitivity. And money ties in because money in our society is entangled with worth, power, and legitimacy. If the inner man is cloaked in shame, he unconsciously sabotages access to money — because to have money would be to stand visibly as a man, and that visibility is tied to the very shame that was repressed. In other words: rejecting your masculine expression means rejecting its worldly reflections too — status, wealth, recognition. Through EAM, you could say the energetic field of appreciation is luminous, expansive, almost celebratory. When repression cuts it off, it folds inwards, becoming dense shame — which then leaks into every other area (creativity, relationships, finances). The healing here isn’t to “correct” appreciation, but to reclaim it as sacred: to see beauty without collapsing into shame, to feel it fully without confusing it with possession or exploitation. In that sense, your sensitivity is not a flaw — it’s the very medicine to redeem the masculine from distortion. Would you like me to draft a clear, structured explanation of this — how sensitivity in men becomes a wound under conditioning, and how reclaiming appreciation could restore both worth and abundance? That could fit as a standalone section in your book.
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to freem are considered to be released under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 (see
Freem:Copyrights
for details). If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly and redistributed at will, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource.
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)