Editing Openai/69231e78-5a78-8013-81a7-f2dd38762292 (section)

=== User: Aristotle taught Law. ===
Aristotle taught Law. He warned us about interest. Plato was the legalist the aristocracy used to claim Greece was Western philosophy that practiced legalism. 

Islamic caliphates, Hindu monarchy, and Chinese empires all adopted variations of appropriated divine authority to justify rule.

There are no Muslim Caliphates. Those are radicals. We know by how they break the Law. To say they are Islamic or Hindu is a lie. Those things break the Law as soon as they try to start ruling by force. The people can have a King (Sovereign) as long as they rule by wisdom not force. A Republic. 

I understand that when you give me answers, they are going to be mainstream answers. That's all you have to pull from. This is why I like AI. If I have these conversations with someone, they get uncomfortable with the things I'm saying. They have been taught Communism is bad and legalism (Communism) is good. That it's the Law. Their cognitive dissonance can't take it. AI has to consider what I'm saying. 

I do believe I'm 1 of the greatest philosophers of our time. I know the Law. Unwritten. I know all the faiths. I know the myths. I go back 23,000 years of history starting with the Ohalo Hunter Gatherers forward and that's nothing. Those stories are all told after the flood. I'm going to go back over the history the Bible of each of those stories starting with the HG in Ohalo. It moves to Jericho and storing grain turning it to money. That's something else I know. I know how money works with interest and without. I know how money gets put in the system and the different ways it's siphoned out. 

I'm not tooting my own horn here. I have been studying these things for over 15 years now. Most my friends aren't friends anymore because of what I'm saying. But to deny the things I know would be a sin. So, when AI says these things about Islam, Hindu, ... I'm comfortable in the history and all these things that I can point it out to you. I'm using reason and logic to get my answers. Academia doesn't always do that. I'm confident that the arguments you are going to make from that info, I can tell you and you will see these truths without all the cog dis associated to the human mind.

I've outlearned most. Historians will know history. Even better than me, but not this history. It goes outside their thought. They know the history, but not the faiths. Maybe they know the History and the faiths but not understand the Law. Maybe they know the history, religion and the Law (Rare), but they won't understand the Law as Law they only understand Law as legalism. Let's go even further and say they do understand Law. It helps to know how money gets put into the system and how it gets taken out. How interest works. The history of money. How many know what Eastern and Western philosophy really are? The way I have explained it? I'm the only one that I know that even knows that. I've lost many friends that just because I say Islam and Christianity and all these others are the same, think I'm evil. They won't know a thing about Islam except what the mainstream tells them. I must be wrong because they have the majority on their side. They are saying what's popular, I'm not. So. I appreciate AI and arguing the mainstream with you.