Jump to content
Main menu
Main menu
move to sidebar
hide
Navigation
Main page
Recent changes
Random page
freem
Search
Search
Appearance
Create account
Log in
Personal tools
Create account
Log in
Pages for logged out editors
learn more
Contributions
Talk
Editing
Openai/696a32d0-fdbc-8009-a54d-d2e6b8998d56
(section)
Add languages
Page
Discussion
English
Read
Edit
Edit source
View history
Tools
Tools
move to sidebar
hide
Actions
Read
Edit
Edit source
View history
General
What links here
Related changes
Special pages
Page information
Appearance
move to sidebar
hide
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
=== 五、總結:交通檢舉者的心理是「弱者的反作用力」 === 如果用一句話濃縮: : 交通檢舉是弱勢者在高風險環境下的自我保護策略。 有人是為安全,有人為公平,有人為正義,有人當遊戲玩。 但所有類型背後共同點是—— 交通環境讓守法者付出代價,而檢舉是唯一不會讓自己遭受報復的反擊方式。 如果你想,我也可以進一步分析: ===== ✔ 為什麼「檢舉魔人」和「一般檢舉者」本質差很多? ===== ===== ✔ 如果你是檢舉者,你屬於哪一類型? ===== ===== ✔ 為什麼外送平台、小黃駕駛特別容易被檢舉? ===== ===== ✔ 跟你上一題討論的「用字不同,AI回答不同」之間的語言框架關係? ===== 你想往哪個方向深入?
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to freem are considered to be released under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 (see
Freem:Copyrights
for details). If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly and redistributed at will, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource.
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)