Jump to content
Main menu
Main menu
move to sidebar
hide
Navigation
Main page
Recent changes
Random page
freem
Search
Search
Appearance
Create account
Log in
Personal tools
Create account
Log in
Pages for logged out editors
learn more
Contributions
Talk
Editing
Openai/6889f15f-fcb0-8003-87d9-1571c30a74bb
(section)
Add languages
Page
Discussion
English
Read
Edit
Edit source
View history
Tools
Tools
move to sidebar
hide
Actions
Read
Edit
Edit source
View history
General
What links here
Related changes
Special pages
Page information
Appearance
move to sidebar
hide
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
=== Assistant: Absolutely, Mr. === Absolutely, Mr. President. Here's my current understanding of the game state, organized by category for clarity. Please confirm if all is accurate or note any corrections. ===== - Public Approval: 40% ===== * Presidential Prestige: 6 (out of 9) * Homeland Security: 6 (range 3–8) * Economy: 6 (range 3–7) * Lingering Domestic Issues (LDIs): 1 (auto-loss at 6) * Domestic Crisis Level: 1 (max 3 before reset + risk of LDI increase) * Cabinet Effectiveness: 4 (succeeds on ≤4 on d10) * Media Relations: 5 (range 2–8) * Relationship with Party: 6 (4 congressional friends) * Relationship with Congress: 5 (3 friends, 2 opponents) * Congressional Cooperation: 2 bills per session (moderates outnumber radicals; we’re in one of the rightmost 2 boxes) * Public's Top Legislative Priorities (in order): 1. Social Security 2. Gun Legislation 3. Education Reform 4. Immigration Reform 5. Cybersecurity * Campaign Promise: Address Lingering Domestic Issues * Canada Ally: Very Close ===== Friends ===== * Barry Gibson: Leg 3 / Media 2 — Radical * Juliet James: Leg 3 — Moderate * Javier Cruz: Leg 2 — Radical Opponents * Lucio Ramos: Leg 3 / Media 2 — Moderate * Kathleen Bell: Leg 2 / Media 1 — Moderate ===== In CONUS (available): ===== * Intel Advisor * Carrier * Spec Ops * USAF * USMC Military Assets Overview: * Army Heavy: Strength 6 * Army Light: Strength 2 * USMC: Strength 3 (amphibious) / 2 (ground) * USAF: Strength 3 * Carrier: Strength 2 * Spec Ops: Strength 1 * Intel Advisor: No combat strength; used for Intel * Each force may have added impact on footprint, deterrence, or stability ===== #### ===== * Alignment: 6 (Pro-US, trending better) * Stability: 6 * Crisis: 0 * Economy: 5 (Peak) * Russia Influence: 1 * Allies: UK & NATO — Very Close * US Bases: Army Heavy, USAF * Mediterranean: Carrier, USMC (can assist here and surrounding regions) ====== - Alignment: 6 ====== * Stability: 5 * Crisis: 1 * Russia Influence: 1 * Civil War: 1 (Ceasefire) * US Base: Army Light ====== - Alignment: 5 (Trending Anti-US) ====== * Stability: 4 * Crisis: 3 * Civil War: 1 * Unstable States: 2 * Terror Groups: 3 (Level 2) * Tensions: Gulf States, Iran * Allies: Israel (Very Close), GS+SA (Close) * US Base: Intel Advisor, Spec Ops, USAF, USMC * US Footprints: 2 ====== - Alignment: 5 ====== * Stability: 4 * Crisis: 3 * China Influence: 1 * Civil War: 1 * Unstable States: 2 * Terror Groups: L1 (1), L2 (1) * US Base: Intel Advisor, Spec Ops * Indian Ocean: Carrier (supports Africa, Middle East, CSA) ====== - Alignment: 5 (Trending Anti-US) ====== * Stability: 5 * Crisis: 2 * Russia Influence: 1 * China Influence: 1 * Rogue State: 1 (L1) * Terror Group: 1 (L2) * Unstable State: 1 * Ally: India (Close), with 1 Tension * US Base: Army Light, USAF, Intel Advisor, Spec Ops * Footprint: 1 ====== - Alignment: 6 ====== * Stability: 6 * Crisis: 1 * Terror Group: 1 (L2) * Tensions: ROK, DPRK * UN Sanctions on DPRK: 1 * China Influence: 1 * Allies: Japan, Australia, ROK — Very Close * ROK: Army Heavy (immobile) * Carrier (immobile; Taiwan deterrent) * Eastern Pacific: USMC, USAF, Carrier ====== - Alignment: 5 ====== * Stability: 4 * Crisis: 2 * Terror Group: 1 (L2) * Unstable State: 1 * US Base: Intel Advisor, Spec Ops ====== - Alignment: 5 ====== * Stability: 5 * Crisis: 1 * China Influence: 1 * Unstable State: 1 * No US Forces ===== (First number = war likelihood [1–5], second = strength differential) ===== * India–China: 1 / +1 China * India–Pakistan: 2 / +1 India * Russia–NATO: 2 / +1 Russia — Auto-loss if war erupts * Russia–Ukraine: 3 / +3 Russia * China–Japan: 1 / +1 China — Auto-loss if war erupts * DPRK–ROK: 2 / Equal — Auto-loss if war + DPRK nuke at 5 * Israel–Iran: 2 / +1 Israel — Auto-loss if war + Iranian nuke at 5 * Israel–Neighbors: 1 / +2 Israel * GS+SA–Iran: 2 / +1 Iran * US–Iran: 1 / +3 US Nuclear Status: * Iran: 2 (Long-range missile testing) * DPRK: 2 (Long-range missile testing) ===== | | | | | ===== | --- | --- | --- | --- | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | ===== - Economy: 4 (Depression) ===== * Posture: 1 (Defensive) * Relations w/ US: 2 (Distrust, trending Anti-US) * Sanctions: 1 Multilateral * Tensions: 2 * Influence: 3 (Victory at 9 + Eastern Europe Base + Eurozone destabilized/UK or NATO not “Very Close”) ===== - Economy: 5 (Recovery) ===== * Posture: 1 (Defensive) * Relations w/ US: 4 (Trading Partners) * Tensions: 1 * Influence: 4 (Victory at 15) Please confirm this is all accurate, Mr. President—or let me know what needs adjusting before we prepare to open the presidential phase.
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to freem are considered to be released under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 (see
Freem:Copyrights
for details). If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly and redistributed at will, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource.
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)
