Jump to content
Main menu
Main menu
move to sidebar
hide
Navigation
Main page
Recent changes
Random page
freem
Search
Search
Appearance
Create account
Log in
Personal tools
Create account
Log in
Pages for logged out editors
learn more
Contributions
Talk
Editing
Openai/691a2d9f-c044-8012-bccf-942bfce6334d
(section)
Add languages
Page
Discussion
English
Read
Edit
Edit source
View history
Tools
Tools
move to sidebar
hide
Actions
Read
Edit
Edit source
View history
General
What links here
Related changes
Special pages
Page information
Appearance
move to sidebar
hide
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
=== Assistant: 17-11-25 03:34 === 17-11-25 03:34 GPT-5.1 Thinking Yeah, now you’re in the regime where the idea stops being “cute sci-fi” and becomes “this is actually a saner megaproject than a Dyson sphere”. Let me rephrase your concept cleanly first, then evaluate it: : Effectively: A Sun–ice logistics catapult. ==== You asked “I’m not aware if there are any ice asteroids.” ==== Broadly: * Main belt has a class of objects often called “main belt comets” or icy asteroids: bodies with asteroid-like orbits but comet-like outgassing. * Beyond the snow line, there are plenty of ice-rich bodies: - outer main belt - Jupiter Trojans - Kuiper belt objects - dwarf planets (Ceres, etc.) * Even inner system water can be imported from: - Martian poles - icy moons (Callisto, Europa, etc., in a more advanced phase). So yes: we absolutely have ice available, the problem is moving it efficiently. Your idea: : That is within the envelope of “ridiculously hard but not unphysical”. ==== Gravity assist 101 but scaled up: ==== * If you send a mass into a very close solar perihelion with the right incoming vector, it can leave with significantly increased heliocentric speed and a steered outbound trajectory. * For spacecraft, we do this with Jupiter/Sun all the time. * For mass blocks, same physics, but: - they need to survive high thermal loads - we may have to wrap the ice in reflective/ablative shells so it doesn’t just vaporize. So the pipeline becomes: # Source ice from outer system or main belt icy bodies. # Package into ice-plus-shell blocks (artificial comets): - radiation shielding - thermal protection - maybe integrated tanks / cavities for future use as depots. # Send them inward on trajectories that dive close to the Sun. # At perihelion, they: - experience intense heating (must be managed) - undergo gravitational slingshot - exit on an engineered outbound path with higher speed. From Earth’s perspective, you’ve built a payload throwing machine that uses free solar gravity instead of powering all the Δv from rockets. ==== You’re implicitly solving three problems at once: ==== # Reaction mass problem - Starships need a lot of mass to throw out the back. - Ice blocks can be melted, cracked into hydrogen/oxygen, or used for thermal rockets, fusion fuel, etc. # Life support / water / shielding - Each block is a reservoir of water for: - drinking - agriculture - radiation shielding (surround habitat sections in water reservoirs). # Logistics depots - Some blocks are designed as: - slow depots parked in outer orbits (Solar System ops) - others as one-way interstellar “dead drops” fired along planned starship routes. You’re not trying to build a continuous chain all the way to Alpha Centauri (the gulf is too empty), but you are: * reducing the initial burden on any generational or fast ship * pre-positioning mass + water in the critical region where getting out of the Sun’s potential is expensive. ==== Let’s be blunt. ==== ===== Dyson sphere level: ===== * structures of AU-scale radius * materials mass on the order of a planetary system * stability nightmares * no plausible engineering path Your idea: * Move asteroid/Kuiper-belt scale mass chunks * Use known orbital mechanics and gravity assists * Build gradually * Each ice block might be 10⁹–10¹² kg instead of 10²⁴ kg level infrastructure So yes: orders of magnitude more realistic than a Dyson sphere. ===== A “one-ark carries 100,000+ years of nuclear fuel” concept: ===== * insane mass requirement * insane reliability demand (no reactor system stays stable that long without massive industrial support) * no redundancy beyond itself Your Sun–ice-catapult concept: * Offloads part of the mass burden into pre-thrown depots * Allows multiple missions to benefit from the same infrastructure * Allows gradual build-out; doesn’t require solving “survive 100k years internally” in one step. So again: yes, strategically easier, even if still huge. ==== Let me compress your idea into a hard-sci-fi architecture: ==== : Phase 1: Ice capture and packaging * Robotic mining tugs harvest ice from: - main belt icy asteroids - outer belt comets - possibly small Kuiper objects * They process and package ice into: - monolithic blocks - or modular tanks inside a tough regolith/metal shell. Phase 2: Inbound injection * Tugs send these blocks on controlled trajectories inward: - aiming for very low perihelion distances - with carefully tuned approach angles. Phase 3: Solar perihelion slingshot * Blocks dive close to the Sun: - reflective shields + ablative layers limit ablation. - gravitational interaction boosts their outbound speed and sets the direction. * After perihelion, they’re outbound on a high-speed vector roughly aligned with chosen deep-space corridors (outer system or eventual interstellar route). Phase 4: Utilization * Some are intercepted in the outer Solar System by: - fusion tugs - generational ships - colony constructors * Others are left as: - logistics depots - future resource nodes - possible anchor points for power/bunker stations. You’ve effectively built a mass-launcher architecture using the Sun as the big gravitational hammer, with ice as the thrown projectiles. ==== - Turns the Solar System into a logistics engine, not just a launchpad. ==== * Sidesteps the dumbest version of the generational ship (one vessel carrying everything for 100,000 years). * Provides a gradual, expandable, revisable infrastructure: - if tech improves, you can send better blocks or tugs later - you can adjust outbound vectors as your understanding of long-term goals changes. And yes, this is a more plausible civilization-scale project than: * “Let’s enclose the Sun.” * “Let’s put 1000 centuries of reactor fuel on a single ark and pray.” If you want next, we can choose a direction: * Engineering pass: rough order-of-magnitude numbers (mass per block, numbers of blocks, perihelion distances, Δv savings). * Narrative pass: how a civilization actually transitions from “orbital tugs” to “Solar Mass Catapult Program.” * Strategy pass: how this interacts with your earlier Vorbis-style desert logistics and comet retrofits.
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to freem are considered to be released under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 (see
Freem:Copyrights
for details). If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly and redistributed at will, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource.
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)