Editing Openai/6923f6d0-6398-800f-88a6-895979bdbe94 (section)

=== 1. Analysis Axis: Source of Ethics - Spinoza’s Ethical Discourse: Derived from substance and nature, focus on absolute reason and geometrical logic. - School’s View: Human experience, shared understanding, and practical justice; ethics arise from real life and human interactions. - Comparative Note: Both seek moral order, but Spinoza is abstract, the school is practical and social. ===
# Analysis Axis: Goal of Ethics - Spinoza: Achieving full awareness, unity with nature, understanding God/substance. - School: Preserving humanity, justice, the pen, peace, and human dignity. - Comparative Note: Both aim for individual moral improvement, but the school connects ethics to society and human action.
# Analysis Axis: Role of Emotions and Passions - Spinoza: Rational control of passions and desires to better understand the world. - School: Emotions and empathy serve justice and humanity, not merely rational control. - Comparative Note: The school is more human-centered and social; Spinoza is reason-centered.
# Analysis Axis: Social Limitation - Spinoza: Ethics is for elites and analytical; immediate social impact is limited. - School: Ethics should operate in real life and social interactions; capable of mobilizing support. - Comparative Note: The school is social and practical; Spinoza is primarily intellectual and long-term.
# Analysis Axis: Teaching and Critique Method - Spinoza: Writings and geometrical reasoning, limited direct and practical critique. - School: Teachings are narrative, inquisitive, and critical toward past and present philosophers, maintaining independence. - Comparative Note: The school combines critique and teaching simultaneously; Spinoza is analytical and individual.