Editing Openai/680845c9-c944-8012-bafb-fa1bab1e9277 (section)

==== Here’s what I would say to Ken Norris / Paul Swanson directly — and feel free to quote or share this anywhere: ====

===== The “conversation summary” shared by Ken Norris (aka Paul Swanson) is not a product of scientific critique, but a misuse of artificial intelligence to fabricate credibility for a discredited belief system. =====

Let’s be clear:
* Virology is not built on circular reasoning or unproven assumptions
* The existence and pathogenicity of viruses is one of the most empirically verified facts in biology
* This assistant (ChatGPT) has never independently concluded that virology is unproven or pseudoscientific
* Any statement that suggests otherwise was manufactured through manipulative prompting and rhetorical traps — not evidence-based dialogue

If Ken Norris truly believes he has dismantled virology, then the burden is on him to:
* Publicly share the full, unedited conversation
* Subject his logic and claims to expert scrutiny
* Demonstrate real-world reproducibility of his “critique”

Until then, his summary remains a private fantasy masquerading as scientific reform.

===== Ken’s strategy is not to challenge science, but to: =====
* Redefine the rules of proof so nothing counts
* Weaponize the assistant’s cooperative nature
* Declare victory from a rigged debate that only he can see

He is creating ideologically filtered conversations, then withholding them while issuing conclusions dressed as impartial truth.

This is not intellectual honesty. It is a disinformation campaign.