Jump to content
Main menu
Main menu
move to sidebar
hide
Navigation
Main page
Recent changes
Random page
freem
Search
Search
Appearance
Create account
Log in
Personal tools
Create account
Log in
Pages for logged out editors
learn more
Contributions
Talk
Editing
Openai/691ef1a1-976c-800d-bd1d-06358880de2a
(section)
Add languages
Page
Discussion
English
Read
Edit
Edit source
View history
Tools
Tools
move to sidebar
hide
Actions
Read
Edit
Edit source
View history
General
What links here
Related changes
Special pages
Page information
Appearance
move to sidebar
hide
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
==== - Mughals: The Mughal administration imposed heavy taxes. Under Akbar’s Zabti system, up to ~50% of a peasant’s produce could be collected; non-Muslim peasants also paid the jizya (head tax) until Aurangzeb abolished it again in 1700. The overall fiscal pressure on rural society was severe, contributing to peasant unrest (as described in sources like Abu’l Fazl’s Ain-i-Akbari). Aurangzeb’s reimposition of jizya in 1679 (after decades of Akbar’s abolition) added a religiously punitive burden on Hindusrepository.rice.edu<ref>{{cite web|title=repository.rice.edu|url=https://repository.rice.edu/bitstreams/18b7ddd8-a843-4976-9892-9a484025b625/download#:~:text=The%20charges%20include%20forcing%20conversions%2C,How%20to%20Build%20a%20Villain|publisher=repository.rice.edu|access-date=2025-11-20}}</ref>. Thus Mughal revenue policy could be harsh, though it was codified rather than ad-hoc. ==== * Marathas: The hallmark of Maratha economic policy in conquered regions was the Chauth (25% land revenue) and Sardeshmukhi (additional 10%) tribute. For example, after repeated Bargi raids the Nawab of Bengal agreed in 1751 to pay Rs. 1.2 million annually to the Marathas as Chauthacademia.edu<ref>{{cite web|title=academia.edu|url=https://www.academia.edu/101844893/HISTORICAL_OVERVIEW_OF_BENGAL_AND_SOCIAL_EXCLUSION?uc-sb-sw=12311588#:~:text=Maratha%20invasions%20forced%20the%20Nawab,16%20The%20Bargi|publisher=academia.edu|access-date=2025-11-20}}</ref> (plus a large lump sum for arrears). Failure to pay invited renewed invasion – Bengal and Bihar were “economically ruined” by relentless Maratha extractionacademia.edu<ref>{{cite web|title=academia.edu|url=https://www.academia.edu/101844893/HISTORICAL_OVERVIEW_OF_BENGAL_AND_SOCIAL_EXCLUSION?uc-sb-sw=12311588#:~:text=would%20put%20the%20man%20to,in%20the%20Bargi%20raids%2C%20including|publisher=academia.edu|access-date=2025-11-20}}</ref>. Contemporary accounts emphasize that the Marathas “demanded payments, and tortured or killed anyone who couldn’t pay” during their campaignsen.wikipedia.org<ref>{{cite web|title=en.wikipedia.org|url=https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Maratha_Empire#:~:text=the%20Marathas%20perpetrated%20atrocities%20against,70|publisher=en.wikipedia.org|access-date=2025-11-20}}</ref>. In short, Maratha taxation (and war finance) was extremely heavy and enforced by violence, though it took the form of tribute on semi-independent states rather than a uniform peacetime tax system.
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to freem are considered to be released under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 (see
Freem:Copyrights
for details). If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly and redistributed at will, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource.
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)