Editing Openai/67f9c019-88f0-8007-a867-29e6f1beeb8b (section)

=== Assistant: Below is a table comparing the three main translation perspectives with respect to their key specifications, overall ch… ===
Below is a table comparing the three main translation perspectives with respect to their key specifications, overall character, and typical outcomes/implications:

|     |     |     |     |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
|     |     |     |     |
|     |     |     |     |
|     |     |     |     |

This table encapsulates the key differences:
* Traditional translators build on an extensive scholarly heritage, ensuring continuity with historical interpretations.
* Qur’an-bil-Qur’an translators claim that the text is self-explanatory and rely solely on internal cross-references for interpretation.
* Cross-linguistic roots translators (like Saint Murad) focus on the etymological origins across related Semitic languages, which can produce radically different—and often contentious—renderings of the text.

Each methodology carries its own set of strengths and challenges, influencing both how the Quran is understood and the theological or scholarly debates it inspires.