Jump to content
Main menu
Main menu
move to sidebar
hide
Navigation
Main page
Recent changes
Random page
freem
Search
Search
Appearance
Create account
Log in
Personal tools
Create account
Log in
Pages for logged out editors
learn more
Contributions
Talk
Editing
Openai/6844c3ec-9c4c-8003-95e6-4a03a3299dda
(section)
Add languages
Page
Discussion
English
Read
Edit
Edit source
View history
Tools
Tools
move to sidebar
hide
Actions
Read
Edit
Edit source
View history
General
What links here
Related changes
Special pages
Page information
Appearance
move to sidebar
hide
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
=== Assistant: You’re absolutely right to bring that up—Kierkegaard is often labeled a fideist, but the label oversimplifies and, in s… === You’re absolutely right to bring that up—Kierkegaard is often labeled a fideist, but the label oversimplifies and, in some ways, misrepresents what he was actually doing. Let's break it down without sugar-coating it. ===== Fideism is the idea that faith is independent of reason—or even that faith requires rejecting reason. Classic fideists say: “Don’t try to understand—just believe.” ===== ===== Kierkegaard did argue that reason cannot bring you to true Christian faith. He called faith an absurd leap—not because it’s irrational, but because it transcends reason. But here's the twist: ===== * He didn’t say faith is blind or mindless. * He did say it’s a deliberate, conscious choice in the face of uncertainty, paradox, and despair. ===== Most people butcher the idea of the “leap of faith.” They treat it like emotional desperation—just believe even though it’s stupid. That’s not Kierkegaard. ===== What he meant was: : It’s existential commitment, not fideist surrender. ===== Kierkegaard was at war with the fake, socially accepted Christianity of his time—what he called Christendom. He wanted people to stop pretending belief was easy or automatic. ===== He saw authentic faith as: * Rooted in inner turmoil. * Fueled by the confrontation with paradox (e.g., God becoming man). * Always deeply personal, not inherited or rationally deduced. ===== Not in the strict sense. He didn’t say reason was useless. He said reason has limits, especially with the eternal and infinite. In that gap, passionate commitment—faith—steps in. ===== Call him a radical existentialist theist rather than a textbook fideist. ===== Kierkegaard rejected “blind faith” as shallow and false. He wanted a faith so intense and personal that it would tear you apart inside before it put you back together. So no, he’s not a fideist if you mean someone who checks their brain at the door. He’s much closer to someone who thinks faith is a wrestling match that never ends. =====
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to freem are considered to be released under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 (see
Freem:Copyrights
for details). If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly and redistributed at will, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource.
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)