Jump to content
Main menu
Main menu
move to sidebar
hide
Navigation
Main page
Recent changes
Random page
freem
Search
Search
Appearance
Create account
Log in
Personal tools
Create account
Log in
Pages for logged out editors
learn more
Contributions
Talk
Editing
Openai/69636561-a85c-8009-a6d2-38643aad9e40
(section)
Add languages
Page
Discussion
English
Read
Edit
Edit source
View history
Tools
Tools
move to sidebar
hide
Actions
Read
Edit
Edit source
View history
General
What links here
Related changes
Special pages
Page information
Appearance
move to sidebar
hide
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
=== User: Research historical and modern precedents where an accomplished investor, advisor, or operator fully funded a company a⦠=== Research historical and modern precedents where an accomplished investor, advisor, or operator fully funded a company and paid the salary of a founder-operator, while retaining majority equity, board control, and ultimate authority, and where the founder-operator functioned day-to-day as the CEO or primary builder. Focus on models where: The founder-operator behaved like a true founder (long-term commitment, identity-level ownership, team-building responsibility) The investor/advisor retained majority ownership and control The company was designed to scale beyond any single individual The structure aimed to minimize key-person risk over time Specifically analyze: Documented precedents (e.g. venture studios, search funds, operator-in-residence models, incubators, or bespoke arrangements) Equity and compensation structures used (salary, vesting, cliffs, option pools, performance-based equity, earn-ins) Governance models (board composition, control mechanisms, IP ownership) Outcomes: Which examples scaled successfully (>$100M, $1B+ if any) Which failed and why Founder-operator retention dynamics: What prevented early departure? What caused departures when they happened? Knowledge-leakage risk: How IP, playbooks, and strategy were protected Lessons learned: Structural patterns that consistently worked Structural patterns that consistently broke at scale Conclude with: A synthesized best-practice structural model for creating a single, long-term, multi-billion-dollar company using this approach Clear warnings about misalignment traps and failure modes A short list of design principles that matter more than legal mechanics
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to freem are considered to be released under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 (see
Freem:Copyrights
for details). If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly and redistributed at will, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource.
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)