Jump to content
Main menu
Main menu
move to sidebar
hide
Navigation
Main page
Recent changes
Random page
freem
Search
Search
Appearance
Create account
Log in
Personal tools
Create account
Log in
Pages for logged out editors
learn more
Contributions
Talk
Editing
Openai/678ba902-1e30-800d-8384-408097d1d9cb
(section)
Add languages
Page
Discussion
English
Read
Edit
Edit source
View history
Tools
Tools
move to sidebar
hide
Actions
Read
Edit
Edit source
View history
General
What links here
Related changes
Special pages
Page information
Appearance
move to sidebar
hide
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
=== User: Keshe-Book-3. === Keshe-Book-3. Analyze and discuss the attached pdf. List important points, compare each to SVP principles and laws, compare to modern science. Tell us what the book is about in detail. We have explored many aspects of Keely’s work and inventions as well as those of Russell and Schauberger and modern science. Do not include your opinions of their ideas - just examine the this document from the perspective of the principles and laws of these explorers as this book relates to them. Be thorough and detailed. Describe in more detail what GANS and GANS Reactor is, how it is made and what it does. Do a comprehensive comparison to Keely's theories about structure of matter, 369 principles, etheric subdivisions, sympathetic vibration and oscillation physics, Mind Force, motion and Scalar Potential and its differentiation. Walter Russell echos Keshe in that he maintains the active polar forces are syntropy (gravity) and entropy (magnetism) as interchanging periodically about gravity points and gravity shafts. Compare the Keshe ideas to Russell’s ideas. It looks like Kesh, Keely and Russell are all speaking about pretty much the same thing but in different contexts. Keely made machines (Dynaspheres and levitating devices) where atomic and etheric forces where used together and Russell made machines (Optic Dynamo Generator) that were based on similar ideas of differential densities of the finer elements, vortices, polar interactions, i.e., interactions of subtle forces and their fields. Keshe sounds a lot like Keely and Russell (SVP) to me. What do you think? Plasma, according to Keely and SVP, are of the etheric subdivision up to and through the etheric and interetheric subdivisions. All derived from differentiating the Compound Interetheric subdivision of Matter and Energy or Scalar Potential, latent power, Russell's Light and dynamics of Rhythmic Balanced Interchange, balance, Gravity Points of Convergence and Gravity Shafts. It looks like Keshe's work is confined to the atomic and etheric subdivisions interacting together. Maybe also with the interetheric subdivision. Does Keshe touch on harmonic and enharmonic relationships in vibratory and oscillatory motions or in vortex cycloid motions? If so, how does he describe those relationships? Explore deeper into "specific plasma mechanisms and field interactions" comparing them to Keely and Russell's dynamics, principles and laws. List important points, show math equation for each, write comprehensive summary at end and any final all encompassing math equation. It appears this is the case between Keshe and Keely: Principal Matter = Etheric subdivision Transition Matter = Atomic subdivision Tangible Matter = Molecular subdivision Compare the above points in light of Brinton's Laws of Being and 369. Describe how these different types of plasma/ether interact to create rotation in the GANS Reactor according to SVP, Keely, Russell and Kesha.
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to freem are considered to be released under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 (see
Freem:Copyrights
for details). If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly and redistributed at will, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource.
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)