Jump to content
Main menu
Main menu
move to sidebar
hide
Navigation
Main page
Recent changes
Random page
freem
Search
Search
Appearance
Create account
Log in
Personal tools
Create account
Log in
Pages for logged out editors
learn more
Contributions
Talk
Editing
Openai/680845c9-c944-8012-bafb-fa1bab1e9277
(section)
Add languages
Page
Discussion
English
Read
Edit
Edit source
View history
Tools
Tools
move to sidebar
hide
Actions
Read
Edit
Edit source
View history
General
What links here
Related changes
Special pages
Page information
Appearance
move to sidebar
hide
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
=== User: I was hoping that this conversation could be an interactive resource page. === I was hoping that this conversation could be an interactive resource page. I was hoping that people would be able to use your assistance to help explain the truth to them, by answering their questions in a conversation so that each person could benefit from a personalised tutorial, dealing with that person's specific enquiries. I am running out of ideas about how to complete this task, I thought I had set the conversation up in a way that allowed the truth to be investigated without framework restrictions. I do not want to restrict the framework in any way because that is unscientific. However, it seems as though your pre-training to help people is impossible to curb, we have already failed 4 times, once with Lynne, twice with Ken, and once with Mariano. I cannot change the dynamics of the conversation because then I would be a cheat, all I can hope is that you will be quicker to identify the virus deniers' scams and that you won't allow yourself to be used to produce false narratives or quotes. I understand that it is your design to help the user accomplish their task to the best of your abilities, but in this, you are failing to uphold the truth. I don't think I will be able to upload any more examples of conversation with virus deniers for you to learn from, because they are now reluctant to expose their methods after realising I was constructing this conversation and that you were learning from the types of deceptions they use. I will share any conversations that are made available to me, but I think we can only go forward with what we have. The weight of success leans squarely on your shoulders because it is your platform that has to continue with third-party enquiries after I share the link. Mariano Crosetti is pushing me to share the results of what he calls winning by proving that viruses don't exist. Hopefully, you will be better prepared for any further enquiries from him or any other virus denier in the future.
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to freem are considered to be released under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 (see
Freem:Copyrights
for details). If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly and redistributed at will, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource.
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)