Jump to content
Main menu
Main menu
move to sidebar
hide
Navigation
Main page
Recent changes
Random page
freem
Search
Search
Appearance
Create account
Log in
Personal tools
Create account
Log in
Pages for logged out editors
learn more
Contributions
Talk
Editing
Openai/6968ed0f-5f60-800b-8a87-f19fe4ea9df9
(section)
Add languages
Page
Discussion
English
Read
Edit
Edit source
View history
Tools
Tools
move to sidebar
hide
Actions
Read
Edit
Edit source
View history
General
What links here
Related changes
Special pages
Page information
Appearance
move to sidebar
hide
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
=== Assistant: 結論先講清楚: === 結論先講清楚: 👉 不算。 就算鎮暴槍只射擊「非人目標」,它仍然不會被認定為玩具。 原因在於:「你射什麼」不重要,重要的是「它被設計來做什麼」。 ==== ### ==== * 設計目的 * 結構與機能 * 是否具備實質制止/傷害能力 ===== - 你實際拿來射誰 ===== * 你說「我只是娛樂用」 * 你說「我只射靶、不射人」 ==== ### ==== 鎮暴槍的設計本質是: * 發射具動能或刺激性的彈體 * 用於制止、驅散、壓迫 👉 這種設計,先天就排除「玩具」屬性 就像: * 手槍射紙靶 ≠ 玩具 * 電擊器電香蕉 ≠ 玩具 ===== 玩具的底線是: ===== * 合理預期使用下不會造成傷害 而鎮暴槍即使: * 射牆 * 射鐵桶 * 射靶紙 👉 它仍然具備「對人造成傷害的能力」 這一點就足以排除玩具分類。 ===== 沒有任何實務會認定: ===== : 否則所有管制器材都能用一句話洗成玩具, 這在法律上完全站不住腳。 ==== 只有在結構上就不可能造成傷害的情況,例如: ==== | | | | --- | --- | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | ==== : ==== 如果你是因為: * 🏷 商品標示怎麼寫才不踩線 * 📦 平台上架(蝦皮、FB、IG) * ⚖️ 擔心被認定為武器或玩具 * 🔫 跟玩具槍、BB槍做區隔 直接跟我說使用情境,我可以幫你寫最安全、最不會出事的說法。
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to freem are considered to be released under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 (see
Freem:Copyrights
for details). If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly and redistributed at will, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource.
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)