Jump to content
Main menu
Main menu
move to sidebar
hide
Navigation
Main page
Recent changes
Random page
freem
Search
Search
Appearance
Create account
Log in
Personal tools
Create account
Log in
Pages for logged out editors
learn more
Contributions
Talk
Editing
Openai/69177fbb-14c4-800f-bc57-ccb5a1d88c95
(section)
Add languages
Page
Discussion
English
Read
Edit
Edit source
View history
Tools
Tools
move to sidebar
hide
Actions
Read
Edit
Edit source
View history
General
What links here
Related changes
Special pages
Page information
Appearance
move to sidebar
hide
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
=== Genome studies give a fairly detailed picture of which Neanderthal segments survive in our genomes and what functions they influence. The key point: almost none of it relates to cognition, autism, or systemizing traits. Instead, surviving segments cluster around traits that were useful when Homo sapiens entered Eurasia. === ===== The strongest surviving regions involve: ===== * antiviral defenses * skin barrier function * innate immunity These conferred survival advantages against Eurasian pathogens. ===== Several surviving Neanderthal variants influence: ===== * hair thickness * skin sensitivity * keratin filament structure These probably helped adapt to colder, lower-UV environments. ===== Some regions affect: ===== * sleep–wake cycle timing * seasonal photoperiod sensitivity This fits with adaptation to high-latitude lighting cycles. ===== A few segments influence: ===== * lipid processing * brown fat thermogenesis Again, Eurasian-environment advantages. ===== Large sections of Neanderthal-derived DNA were purged strongly, especially around: ===== * brain development * testes and reproductive genes * language-related regions * neurogenesis This implies that Neanderthal alleles were maladaptive when introduced into Homo sapiens in precisely the domains that RDOS’s theory claims they shaped. In short: * What stuck around mostly shaped skin, immunity, and metabolism. * What got removed is heavily enriched for cognition and neurodevelopment. So the genetic landscape contradicts RDOS’s thesis.
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to freem are considered to be released under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 (see
Freem:Copyrights
for details). If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly and redistributed at will, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource.
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)