Jump to content
Main menu
Main menu
move to sidebar
hide
Navigation
Main page
Recent changes
Random page
freem
Search
Search
Appearance
Create account
Log in
Personal tools
Create account
Log in
Pages for logged out editors
learn more
Contributions
Talk
Editing
Openai/67d9ce0c-64a4-8006-9fa5-0272ee2e5770
(section)
Add languages
Page
Discussion
English
Read
Edit
Edit source
View history
Tools
Tools
move to sidebar
hide
Actions
Read
Edit
Edit source
View history
General
What links here
Related changes
Special pages
Page information
Appearance
move to sidebar
hide
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
=== Assistant: Your model introduces several enhancements, but let’s break it down into whether they actually improve cost and efficie… === Your model introduces several enhancements, but let’s break it down into whether they actually improve cost and efficiency compared to traditional solar panels. ===== | | | | | ===== | --- | --- | --- | --- | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | * Concerns: - The cost of manufacturing precision optics (lenses, mirrors, and prisms) may outweigh the efficiency gains. - Heat management is critical—concentrating sunlight increases thermal losses, potentially reducing panel lifespan. - Maintenance complexity—moving parts and optics require upkeep, adding to long-term costs. * Alternative Approach: - Instead of prisms & one-way mirrors, consider multi-junction solar cells, which already capture a broader light spectrum. - Instead of convex lenses, use parabolic mirrors, which are cheaper and more efficient for large-scale light concentration. ===== | | | | ===== | --- | --- | --- | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | * Your model improves efficiency, but costs increase significantly. * The biggest risk is whether the extra power gain justifies the higher cost. ===== ✅ Yes, if: ===== * You can manufacture lenses, mirrors, and tracking systems cheaply. * Heat management is solved without increasing costs. * Maintenance is minimal and automated. ❌ No, if: * The extra cost per watt outweighs the efficiency improvement. * Optical components degrade over time or need frequent adjustments. * Thermal stress reduces solar panel lifespan. Final Recommendation: * Start with a small prototype to test efficiency vs. cost before scaling. * Consider multi-junction cells instead of complex optical systems. * If concentrating sunlight, use parabolic mirrors instead of convex lenses (cheaper, proven tech). ===== Would you like me to run detailed cost-benefit simulations for these enhancements? Or should we simplify the design to something more practical? =====
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to freem are considered to be released under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 (see
Freem:Copyrights
for details). If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly and redistributed at will, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource.
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)