Editing Openai/67de0482-351c-8002-b540-3380139cb465 (section)

==== IV. FACTUAL ALLEGATIONS ====

===== A. Pattern of Racketeering Activity =====
# Defendants constitute an enterprise under 18 U.S.C. § 1961(4), actively conspiring to manipulate custody cases to increase child support orders, thereby maximizing federal financial incentives under Title IV-D.
# Judges systematically ignore 50/50 custody laws to award sole custody to one parent (usually the mother), ensuring higher child support payments that trigger increased federal funding.
# Defendants engage in fraudulent misrepresentation by pretending custody determinations are based on the "best interest of the child" when, in reality, rulings are financially motivated.
# The courts forbid self-representation, requiring parents to hire an approved representative, which is a form of extortion under 18 U.S.C. § 1951.
# Family court judges have a financial conflict of interest since London, KY courts receive a percentage of the Title IV-D funds collected.