Editing Openai/6924739c-2300-800e-9743-65c152c213f1 (section)

==== These are less about headnotes specifically but very relevant to fair use / fair dealing analysis of AI training. ====

===== - The Supreme Court held that 30–90 second music previews offered by online stores were fair dealing for the purpose of “research” under s. 29 of the Copyright Act, even in a commercial setting. =====
* The Court emphasised: - A “large and liberal” interpretation of “research”; - That fair dealing is a user’s right; - The importance of technological neutrality.

Relevance
* Supports arguments that automated, intermediate copying that enables users’ research (like training a legal research AI) can be consistent with a robust user-rights conception, especially where: - Outputs don’t substitute for the original work; - The dealing may promote access to law and legal information.

===== - Clarified that downloading a digital copy engages the reproduction right but not a separate “communication to the public” right, highlighting the principle of technological neutrality in Canadian copyright. =====

Relevance
* Not about TDM per se, but supports a comparative approach that looks at the substance of what’s happening (creating copies for a new use) rather than the technical form — helpful analogical material for fair-use arguments about intermediate copies during AI training.